A Street Photographer's Viewpoint - Hidden Deceptions

Ignore Reading Anything Below If You Have -- Ego Or Self-Pride Issues.

Trust Nothing - Question Everything!

All Still Images By Rick Hemi

If dismissing the entire heliocentric model theory what then are you left with?

Just like millions of other people throughout the planet, most don't struggle capturing sharp in focus sun and lunar snaps with whatever camera gear being used — even when the earth, is constantly moving through space, spinning @1000 MPH at the equator, orbiting around the sun @66 mach speed, swirling and moving in four different directions through space at half a million MPH. We must give thanks to pseudoscience for the above calculations. It began when we started our first day at school staring at a spinning ball on the teachers desk. In the 2020s, indoctrination programming has reached beyond all expectations. The Gen Z generation, is proof of that— the entitlement generation of all time, like docile brained fogged sheep herded into divisional group think wokeness. Smartphone junk has replaced their brains. They believe anything Google shows them. They cannot handle anything outside of what they've been indoctrinated with. This also includes people born in the 1960s, who hold on to certain historical events that are now proven to be fake, but they can't let go, because it will totally destroy everything they had believed in — didn't happen. Keeping global populations penned inside plantations, is must do priority at all costs. CIA based MK-Ultra mind-control programming has never stopped. It's been working perfectly, since its creation, continuously expanding itself on generation after generation. Nothing has ever stopped. Only those with self-critical thinking skills have the ability to question anything they're daily bombarded with. Everything we've been told have been endless packages of lies and deceit.
The Rape of the Mind by Joost A. M.Meerloo.

Using images, screenshots of images, data, or maps from this website even with original source links back to this website is INVALID, without prior permission and consent by the website owner — Are you a Website image thief?

DSLR lunar snaps captured on the Earth's surface using a tripod while spinning @1000 MPH — How about that?

One of the great deceptions in living memory has to be those incredibly sharp images taken on the Moon between 1969-72. All image shots were captured with 6x6cm medium format Hasselblad cameras with 50mm lenses, using standard 120 slide roll film. People still actually believe those lunar images were taken on the Moon. As a street photographer, since the 1980s, I've used 35mm SLR and medium format 120 roll film cameras, and know how sensitive roll film was within different environments. Most of all, when passing through airport X-ray machines, quality made lead protective bags were required for both unused and used film from being tarnished. Passing through the Van Allen belt with roll film — twice, and surviving extreme subzero and blistering hot temps on the Moon, is dream fantasy. The following, is directly from the https://lunar.gsfc.nasa.gov website - Taking The Moon's Temperature "Daytime temperatures near the lunar equator reaches a boiling 250 degrees Fahrenheit (120C,400K), while nighttime temperatures get to a chilly -208 Fahrenheit (-130, 140K). The Moon's poles are even colder"

We have been programmed since the first day of school the Earth constantly moves and rotates at massive speeds that are never felt.  

Now tell me, how can Eastman Kodak 120 roll film survive in such extreme temperatures - totally impossible. Stanley Kubrick gets the last laugh. Fact Check — Celluloid in 120 roll film and cine has a melting pointing of 150° Fahrenheit. Repeat — Melting Point. A more in depth view from a professional photographer who used Hasselblad cameras confirms the fakery. The latest, the Indian south pole lunar lander apparently is dead. No one from earth can see, video or photograph this location wink wink. The batteries drained due to the minus -334 degree Fahrenheit temps — according to NASA. There's more information in the last sentence that most ignore. Any human that's been on the moon would also be dead. The most dumb down nation that have constantly been pummeled with NASA space agendas, is America. The majority of liberal and conservative Americans find it extremely difficult acknowledging they've been deceived and lied to, by their own government. Erasing decades of brainwashing, coming to terms with what they've believed happened, did not happen, strips anyone's Ego totally to shreds. All those alphabet agencies weren't created just for power, spying and making insider profit for themselves. They were designed as backdoor gatekeepers keeping everything they first created in check. NASA has been the leader of fake space gatekeeping, since 1958.

Typical slow gradual clockwise lunar rotation of the moon moving through the night sky. This is what we see no matter what landmass or continent we live on. The above Lunar cycle was approximately 7 hours of rotational clockwise movement. This is what is called perspective view when observing the Moon from East to West.

The above snaps when placed in uniform show 25° anti-clockwise rotation change.

We take everything at face value when observing the Moon. In most cases, angular perspective lunar movement at any given location will vary. For instance, the captures above were taken 36 minutes of each other showing a 15° clockwise change from the same location. When observing from East to West, the Moon will appear to have cartwheeled its position. This is caused when changing perspective viewing angles directly from East to West.

Eight hours between captures, both @15° elevation levels positioned directly looking from S.E. to S.W (June solstice). There was minimal change of perspective viewing angle without the need of turning around. Lunar captures were taken 1100 kms from the equator. In other words, observing both lunar positions @15° S.E. to S.W. didn't require the 180° overhead viewing angle, as needed when the Moon moves from an East to West position. In yet the Moon visibly showed the same rotational clockwise perspective change, as it would from an East to Westward 180° perspective viewing angle. Most use the 180° overhead East to West viewing angle to show the perspective change. Do your own time and motion study at the same location during both solstices.

Lower non-overhead S.E. to S.W.perspective angle changes show the same perspective changes as direct overhead 180° East to West show.

Four nights between captures taken at the same location. Lunar perspective view @40° - 46° south east — July 25-27-29-2024.

The average person will normally take quick snaps of the Moon within short time periods choosing the best looking capture that's then added to travel folders, photo libraries, or placed on social media platforms. The majority of global population have no other interest of the Moon, of what the Moon is doing through weekly, month to month yearly cycles. It's not until one becomes more interested observing closer Moon movements of what the Moon is actually doing through different cycles.
Depending on location, Moon movements differ through cycles. This of course by many is regarded as speculation only. Does the Moon move further out and closer in while still remaining on the same orbiting path? Yes it does. I've captured images of dramatic Lunar diameter changes. More on that further below. Does the Moon rapidly rotate in both directions at certain times? Yes it does. I've captured rapid 90° rotational shifts moving in one or both directions 8+ times. If anyone reading this has also captured other interesting Lunar activity, you're welcome to contact me. Check all your older Lunar shots and captures, one by one, especially images that may have been discarded that were taken at first visibility and during fading times. In saying that, many would have deleted those files in the trash.      

Perspective view of Lunar angle change during a two hour time frame — south west viewing position.

This is not moon wobble. Moon wobble, is star trek lost in space pulp fiction pseudo-science. What is factual, the Moon is constantly moving in four directions during phases — slow and rapid anti-clockwise, clockwise, forward and backward movements. Normal slow movement occurrences will appear at different angles and positions during cycles. Most will not see small changes without actually observing closeup Lunar activity. Again, nothing new here. What is partially hidden, and hasn't had any exposure, is what the Moon is doing within thick atmospheric density just before or on first visibility. The Moon, at times rapidly rotates 90° in anti-clockwise, clockwise directions — within seconds. At times, more than two rapid 90° rotations occur. The same occurrence also happens during fading times. This requires substantial proof and evidence backing up this claim, super rapid 90° rotations do occur through various lunar cycles. I have that evidence.

Theories on lunar movements are numerous with speculated viewpoints and analyses from mild to wild. It's been said that we cannot trust our own eyes, including whatever has been videoed or photographed used as evidence. The above captures are shown further down the page with original EXIF timestamp data and other interesting info. 

These still capture examples, taken 95 minutes between shots show minor Lunar movement. This will be regarded, as angular perspective view from any particular location, not movement. It's not until individual Lunar images are stacked in layers showing any movement activity. The closer the elevation levels are to one another of selected images, is when movement and diameter changes are spotted. This is when the angular perspective theory is ruled out.     

Below, typical perspective view from East to west. Nothing extraordinary here. The Moon when captured from an East to West position at the same location will give the same results. For a quick test, place a camera on a tripod in the center of a room. Draw a circle on two A4 sheets with a dot at 12'oclock. Place each A4 at opposite sides of the room on the ceiling and pan the camera.  

From east to west, camera gear lunar captures requires one common accessory — a tripod.

Perspective view at the same location from one day to the next, both at 13° East elevation. A 7° clockwise rotational change is apparent.

There's never ending chatter on Lunar perspective view from amateurs to lab coat professionals. Lunar perspective view changes when viewing from an East to West direction at the same location. Lunar movement (rotational changes) have nothing to do with perspective viewing. The examples above show rotational movement through different cycle periods at 33° West to 7° West using the same camera gear, while at this same location. The images record individual <exif:DateTimeOriginal> when captured, including format dimensions i.e. 4800 x 3200. It's worth mentioning, NASA, since the 1960s have stated the following within their own log files 'relative to a non-rotating flat earth', also within today's aviation flight dynamics manuals — using assumptions 'There is a flat earth, the Earth's curvature is zero, there is a non-rotating Earth'. This suggests lunar rotational activity, is by the Moon's own rotational movement.

At times, grain becomes your best friend when enlarging, cropping, pushing sharpness to more than what's required. Lunar shots bring the best and worst out of image captures. Keeping ISO settings low as possible when using wide apertures will help. Above non-stacked snap

Lunar perspective view and lunar diameter changes @10° S.E. to 2° S.W. taken at the same location using the same photo gear and format — duration time 9 hours.

DSLR Dinosaur Photo Gear - 2024

Many do think newer designed camera gear is better — Really?

If I had instead said the above image was taken with the latest camera gear, most would believe it —  Nikon 2007 D3, 800 5.6 1986 prime.

There are exceptions with certain full frame DSLR bodies, no matter the brand. Just to prove that point, I recently took half a dozen lunar shots with a 2007 Nikon D3 (April 2024). Above, is one of those captures, taken in DX format with a 1986 Nikkor 800 5.6 ED AIS manual focus prime lens. That's a 21 year older lens design than the D3 producing — wait for it, a 6MP image. How about that? The hyper megapixel addiction is deceptive. Anyone using older model camera bodies, like the D700, D3, D3S, who are unable to capture stills, like above, has nothing to do with camera design. User error is to blame. Above image — F/11, 1/60 sec, 200 ISO, cable release, tripod with 10kg added weight. Below, grain in some cases cannot be avoided. The capture has no post-processing additions. 

Today, with more and more into video than still photography, laziness is apparent. Taking selections of stills from video clips, and stacked, is all the rage. Single non-stacked lunar stills from video compared to single stills individually captured look crappy subpar. Honestly, the time and effort creating these snaps into large wall canvas images is a waste of time. In most cases, enlarging images taken from 'video' beyond its original dimensions will look worse than with smartphone junk captures. Best advice — one single camera still image taken in RAW with quality lenses will have more value than what any video screen-grab can offer. Below, camera and lenses also have limitations. A cropped example using 10% from a 3200 x 4800 image shows grain and minimal sharpness.

Seasoned photographers know the importance of original RAW file data. Capturing Lunar shots, especially of unusual and odd Lunar movements requires verified RAW timestamp data i.e <exif:DateTimeOriginal>. This holds integrity of format and when original RAW images were captured. This includes ownership of that image. A good example of this, is found in 'Are You An Image Website Thief?', of a snow leopard that was reverse cloned taken from another photographers snow leopard image. The image thief, an acclaimed wildlife photographer refused to show the original EXIF data for obvious reasons  —  December 2022.

Most Lunar shoots remain the same format throughout each shoot. This eradicates any confusion of how the images were captured. Above, typical Raw NEF images, as the way they were originally captured — vertical DSLR full frame 3200 x 4800 DX format.

At the above location the moon @4° elevation @70% was struggling with detail and sharpness.   

Lunar shots taken within different environments ranging from subzero minus -33C to +40C. 

Lunar shots taken from both sides of the equator with an 11 year time difference between captures.

The above midnight snap, an example showing the strength and placement of Lunar light through low forming cloud beyond the boat. Why was there almost no Lunar light on the left side of the image at this Moon's elevated degree level? Calculating the distance and length of landmass to what we've been told of the Moon's distance in this image doesn't add up. Lunar light reflection should have been visible across this short distance. This suggests the Moon's orbital path is much closer than 239,000 miles (385,00km). Below, lunar snap @54° E.

The ultimate times capturing abnormal Lunar occurrences, is when the Moon becomes first visible in the East and during low level elevation in the West. Each location will give varying exposure results, some better than others. The above RAW NEF examples show how fast Lunar fading increases from 8° to 5° as daybreak emerges from the East. Lunar fading at low elevation levels during darkness give similar results — grainy subpar snaps. This is not about winning photo-contests here — forget about that. The majority of photographers and videographers would have already packed up their photo gear at most locations above 8° West. Lunar sharpness begins to pixelate at these low elevations. Above snaps — DSLR DX 32x48 vertical @600mm.

The rare occasion capturing lunar shots @3° West. Visibility varies at these elevations with the usual issues of low cloud cover, haze and atmospheric density. Shoreline and mountainous regions are the worst locations for this issue. The above snaps were hardly visible at the time they were taken. Plus 80 brightness was added in post-processing just to get them on this page — DSLR, prime lens.

Above, typical tripod adjustments during a lunar shoot. This is easily done when the Moon is above 25° elevation. At lower elevation levels, below 3°, is a different story. Density, haze and cloud cover become your worst enemy. At times, I've missed the target, just by doing one small tripod readjustment. Lunar visibility becomes difficult through the lens, even with binoculars, especially during fading times.

An extreme subzero midwinter high altitude lunar shot taken just below 3700m @ minus -35C 

Shooting RAW - Don't Think Do It!

I personally only use RAW format for all kinds of still photography — including lunar shots. After each shoot, copies are made from the original RAW files before placed in safe storage. This keeps all original files untouched that could be mistakenly modified.

Below shows part of the EXIF data, the image format dimensions (3200 x 4800), and camera shutter timestamp. Always use copies of RAW files keeping original RAW image files stored separately in a safe place. Backup of 2-3 copies of original RAW files is recommended placed in various external hard drives.

If your camera photo gear can capture non-stacked still images like below — you're good to go.

Keep it simple — place camera on tripod, set aperture, shutter speed, focus, take the shot.

I'm an overland travel street photographer, and have been for decades. I've had little to no interest in videography for one simple reason. Image captures hung on walls in canvas keep their ambience for years. As for smartphone junk, if I actually have one with me, is switched off. In 2023, I never used a smartphone — not once!. That's how much I don't need them — for anything! It also avoids evasive snooping, auto-tracking, data collecting, street surveillance tracking, most of all — addictive swiping. In other words, no smartphone — zero surveillance. It's far better traveling with cheap Chinese wing bling burner phones when crossing, entering international borders. Sat phones are excellent, although numerous countries ban using them.

USB 2 & 3 external hard drives. If they function as they should —use them for secondary backup of data files.

Any cloud storage owned and controlled by corporate data banks holding personal files and images is totally insane — no thanks. Instead, use external hard drives for backing up your files. External hard drives are only as good as their owner. Some common failures with external hard drives can be easily avoided. 1. initial formatting 2. accidentally dropping hard drives 3. protectively packed down during transit. On arrival at airports, customs may want to browse through hard drives searching for prohibited files or data. If you're clean, you have nothing to worry about. Double backing up of all original image files is recommended. Just in case, a third backup drive can be stored somewhere safe.           

I still use a few old dinosaur lenses. A favorite, the 1986 manual focus Nikkor 800 5.6 ED AIS prime. Now a 38+ year old lens. With a 3x tele-converter, in DX format, the 800 5.6 will give a 3600mm range. Do I need all that distance? No, it's overkill not required. Above, the Moon @70%, 5° East shimmering at normal moving speed. 

One of the first lunar snaps taken with the Nikkor 800 5.6 ED AIS prime — Lens rating 9/10

Do You only Take Candid Moon Snaps? Eyes Wide Shut!

Surprise yourself — sifting through discarded Lunar file snaps may show something interesting you had never noticed. 

The Moon is never boring, especially when at 0° to 20° elevation levels at both, East and West directions. It's not about personal creativity capturing that one shot that surpasses anything one has previously captured. It's about different kinds of Lunar activity that we can't see occurring with the naked eye. We look at the Moon taking it for granted, as if the Moon is on auto-pilot performing the same routines, as it did yesterday, last week, last year, and hasn't changed one bit. It's not until looking closer, observing specific Lunar behavior, comparing image captures taken through the same timelines and through different cycles — You have nothing to lose.

Above and below are the usual candid Lunar snaps. Time spent capturing Lunar images within a 12 hour period for most, is under 30 minutes. What most miss out on, is Lunar activity through the other eleven and half hours. Spending more time observing Lunar movements, rather than what's in front of the Moon can give some surprising results.  

HEMI 90° - Super Rapid 90° Rotations  - Anti-clockwise - Clockwise

Something is always happening. When it happens people don't always see it, understand it, or accept that it did happen.

DSLR RAW NEF rapid 90° lunar rotation captures — 2016, 2018, 2022, 2023 

Did NASA already know about these super rapid 90° Lunar rotations in the 1960s of the impossibilities of landing on the Moon?

Being honest, I've probably stumbled across something beyond what most are unable to comprehend, believe or even digest. What's been captured not only exposes these events happening. The question is, if hierarchy establishments have known about these occurrences, keeping a tight lid on it for decades. My first discovery of rapid 90° rotations occurring, in both directions, was in November 2016. Since then, numerous 90° rapid rotations have been still captured, before and after each rotation had occurred. The actual rotation happens quick and fast — within seconds. Original RAW EXIF footprint data at the time of each capture, is rock solid evidence, and cannot be altered. One only has to open any original RAW file image unaltered clarifying when that particular image file was exactly taken, including the files format dimensions in either horizontal or vertical position showing this <exif:DateTimeOriginal>2024-01-23T16:54:12</exif:DateTimeOriginal>
The following Metadata is incorrect, and should not be confused. It shows the time of the creation date instead — <xmp:CreateDate>2024-01-31T14:34:41</xmp:CreateDate> which means the image was created from a file saved in Tiff, PNG or Jpeg format. Also with more than 8+ captures of rapid 90° rotations taken during different timeline periods through different months — conspiracy is ruled out. All I can say, is everything we've been told related to Lunar events, since the 1960s, is questionable. Look at my data, go through it once, twice, as many times required acknowledging what has been captured and revealed here. Nothing at all vain or for fame here, I call my captures HEMI 90° — crediting my own name. 1st dual rotation 2016, 2nd triple rotation 2018, 3rd dual rotation 2022, 4th single rotation 2023.  

Original RAW NEF EXIF <DateTimeOriginal> of images — All three image captures were taken in horizontal format.

Super rapid 90° lunar clockwise, anti-clockwise rotations captured in November 2016, @12:57:23 am to 12:59:50 am. That's one 90° clockwise rotation in 0.40 seconds, and one 90° anti-clockwise rotation within one minute 47 seconds, totaling 2 minutes 27 seconds for both 90° rotations. What does this tell you outright? These rapid 90° rotations happen within seconds — not minutes. It also reveals we have either been blind or somewhat docile and deceived in the modern age not knowing these occurrences are happening, and have been happening throughout time. Gatekeepers hiding secrecy, is nothing uncommon. We do live in a world of complex layers. Exposing some of that secrecy, is more than difficult without being labelled as conspiracy. All original images were captured horizontally, taken in RAW NEF format. All original images contain EXIF data timestamps —as  shown above. The complete series of all 10 original RAW NEF image files have been placed together in sequence in the video page — Lunar 2016

Top left —JPEG rendered  from SPD1399.NEF 12:59:01 November 2016 : Top right — JPEG rendered from SPD1400.NEF 12:59:50 November 2016

Original November 2016 NEF file images with copies of each file revealing 2 x 90° rapid lunar rotations had occurred in 2 mins.47 secs.

To show authenticity I had captured rapid 90° rotations, the sequence of stills in the below Gif show the outline of coconut trees in the foreground. At the time, did I know I had captured these 90° rotations? No. Was the Moon clearly visible? No. The original RAW files were underexposed at that particular time when the Moon first appeared behind the trees. Adjusting the tripod and camera angle is clearly visible. When did I first discover these RAW files showed 2 x 90° rotations? Around a week later from first capturing them. The images below were done by reducing contrast and color bringing out whatever could be salvaged from completely dark black foregrounds. All 8 images are FX 7360x4912 horizontal format.

Bringing out the shadows revealing coconut trees and tips of coconut leaf scraping through the edges of the Moon from both sides.

NASA, in their own words "Finally, the Moon appears to tilt back and forth like a metronome. The tilt of the Moon's orbit contribute to this, but it's mostly due to the tilt of our Earth" — Earth's axial tilt actually oscillates only between 22.1 and 24.5 degrees following the imaginary line on a globe model. NASA still cannot produce images and video, non-stop live feed of Earth, in its full shape and form, which NASA has failed to do so — since the 1960s. Because of this, NASA has proven by themselves they have  never been beyond low Earth orbit. A recent 2024, 45 minute interview —Were moon landings faked? Bart Sibrel (American pride put at risk).
My image captures reveal 100%, rapid 90° super fast rotations do occur, and can be captured at any location when Lunar orbit at that location, is timed to rotate. There is no time clock when rotations occur. We are not talking about slow "back and forth" tilt wobbles NASA wants you to believe. NASA psyops, since the 1960s, have been so great, by continuous fake space programing deceptions. This has caused the majority of populations suffering diverse brain fog symptoms. The only way breaking spells, is to question everything trusting nothing. Self-researching whatever data is still available, before it disappears, is a good start.

When capturing super rapid 90° rotations numerous times — One has to question everything we have been told.

Above, multiple rapid 90° lunar rotations taken in sequence in DSLR RAW format. The 1st rapid 90° rotation occurred between ARN6637 NEF & ARN6638 NEF, in clockwise direction between 02:14:12 to 02:15:04 (0.52 seconds). The 2nd rapid 90° rotation occurred between ARN6664 NEF & ARN6665 NEF, in anti-clockwise direction between 02:25:54 to 02:27:43 (one minute 49 seconds). The third rapid 90° rotation occurred between ARN6679 NEF & ARN6680 NEF, in clockwise direction between 02:32:32 to 02:34:10 (one minute 38 seconds). All above rapid 90° rotations had occurred in 19 minutes 58 seconds. (added brightness has been added to the above images)
Note, I'm not anyone's personal Moon guru, I'm just showing what I've personally captured since 2016. This would be even more positive, if other still photographers are able to capture the same occurrences, at different locations on other continents. What I'm voicing out, these rapid 90° rotations are occurring through Lunar cycle orbits, at any given time period through 24 hour cycles — at any location! My clockwise, anti-clockwise rapid 90° rotation captures have occurred during poor visibility. It's at this time during thick atmospheric density these occurrences have happened and been captured.  
I've been told by certain people, these rapid 90° left and right rotations are impossible occurrences, and why haven't other photographers captured the same events happening. First, It all depends where one is located, the position, the appearance of first available glimpses of the Moon when rapid 90° rotations can be captured. These occurrences may occur within thick atmospheric density, at times impossible to see with the naked eye, through camera lenses, binoculars or telescopes. A recycled post found online from 2004 appears to show an apparent Lunar rotation. I've captured these smaller rotations numerous times.  
In general, no one will waste their time and effort taking images of dark atmosphere with nothing visible in it. 99.9% of dark unclear, hazy focus Moon shots are discarded and deleted. I would assume there are others out there that don't even know they have Lunar rotations stored in external hard drives  — check your old digital files. In general, it's not until the Moon becomes clearly visible with enough light source when people take their images. As mentioned, these rapid 90° rotations may have already occurred just before visibility — at any given location on earth. So what does that mean? Be persistent, try different timelines through the year. My  own 90° captures span through Sept, Oct, Nov, Dec.
It's logical, rapid rotations of this magnitude aren't happening just at one location. They are occurring through Lunar cycles at certain timelines,  especially when the Moon is still within thick atmospheric density with low visibility. This equates, that it doesn't matter where you are located, no matter the continent when rapid 90° rotations may suddenly happen.
Has NASA known about  these super rapid 90° clockwise anti-clockwise rotations occurring repeatedly through Lunar cycles?  Personally, yes, I'm sure they do. The biggest coverup of all time, since NASA was established. I don't name them HEMI 90° rotations for nothing. It appears, am I the only person discovering these events with more than enough evidence and data proving they happen? There must be others out there? Or are they remaining silent not believing what they've captured? Who knows. What I do know, I've captured 8+ rapid 90° rotations spanning back to 2016. Top smoking gun evidence, nothing can land on the Lunar surface and survive these rotations. This places NASA's yearly multi-billion dollar budget to question, including all those within high establishments remaining silent.

All six image captures were taken in horizontal format i.e. FX 7360 x 4912 and  DX 4800 x 3200. What's most important, is the Original RAW NEF EXIF <DateTimeOriginal> of each image verifying authenticity. Open to enlarge each file.

Note Absolutely nothing fake, misleading, manipulated, switched, swapped, changed, flipped, cloned or dishonest here. No matter what one may assume, the images and Raw timestamp data of multiple rapid 90° Lunar rotations occurring under 20 minutes, is rock solid evidence. I can personally assure all my original RAW NEF files and timestamp data will hold withstanding their authenticity in the highest court of law of any forensic evaluation. The image captures will be so baffling, many will scratch their heads sideways wondering how much they've been indoctrinated with decades of fake space programmed deception. The images and Raw data presented here will produce negativity in certain people going down the path of manipulating Lunar images and data to satisfy their own inflated egos. Not to worry, you're  not alone, NASA has been doing this since 1969, nothing new there. One can either swallow their pride, or continue following the NASA narrative. That's your free will and choice, not mine. Best advice, spend time when possible observing Moon movements through different Lunar cycles. Use real photo gear capturing Lunar shots in RAW format. RAW images contain original footprint data at the time they were captured  — excludes non-digital roll film cameras. Even low IQ debunkers know this. 

December 2018, original RAW NEF files, as captured with no additional post-color changes. A total of 89 RAW images were taken within 35 minutes. Between ARN6594 and ARN6683, multiple rapid 90° clockwise anti-clockwise rotations had occurred. The above NEF files show the different positioning of the Moon (90° clockwise) within this time duration @2° to 9° degrees altitude. The shape of the Moon also changed during these rotations. Visibility of these rapid rotations occurring was difficult unless using binoculars. I'm using the best available proof of authenticity using RAW NEF timestamp data of each image when they were exactly captured.   

Original RAW NEF EXIF  <DateTimeOriginal> of images — Both image captures were taken in horizontal format i.e. DX 4800 x 3200

Super rapid multiple 90° anti-clockwise, clockwise rotations. All rotations occurred in 19 minutes 58 Secs. @5°-9°East.

The Apollo mission trajectories landing and lift-offs, including walking on the lunar surface before, during and after rapid 90° rotational shifts in clockwise and anticlockwise directions, is more than questionable. In other words — It never happened. This is my own smoking gun evidence, we have been continuously deceived and lied to, since the 1960s. This also implies nothing man made has past beyond low earth orbit. NASA are the gatekeepers of fake space. Just don't look or question anything beyond 60° south of Antarctica — That gateway was shut down in 1959, one year after NASA was established. In other words, everything about space, is to keep Antarctica on ice. Nothing is what it appears to be. The deception is so great, most generations since the 1960s will have difficulty believing what is shown on this page.

A super rapid 90° clockwise lunar rotation had occurred between 02:14:12 to 02:15:04 -- 0.52 seconds between captures @5° East

Above, before and after captures of the Moon rotating 90° clockwise within 52 seconds between captures. There has been zero mention by NASA, or from Apollo astronauts experiencing rapid 90° Lunar rotations. This is because, no one has never been on the Moon. Rapid 90° rotations are real. Rapid 90° rotations happen mostly in obscurity within dense atmospheric density. At any given location when observing first glimpses of Lunar presence, rapid 90° rotations may or may not have occurred.
With many attempts, I've only managed capturing one rapid 90° rotation on the fall side during fading, when atmospheric density was @99%. What does that mean? Images captures were jet black, as though the Moon had already vanished. This also reveals rapid 90° rotations are happening during first visibility and when fading. Photographers 300-600 kilometers further East or West may have better chances capturing 90° rotations. Every location, no matter where it is, will deal with varying atmospheric density and obscurity issues on first and last sightings of the Moon. As most can see, the majority of my own 90° rotation images are low subpar because of this.       

Above, horizontal cloud shading compared to weird vertical shading, shown below captured just after a rapid 90° rotation.

Just after a rapid 90° rotation occurred @1° W progressive vertical type shading, similar to CGI glitching occurred, or was it just cloud?

At times, vertical shading has appeared just before or just after rapid 90° rotations occur (within seconds). The above Lunar captures were hardly visible, but clearly shows a shading effect process happening from 03:47:49 - 03:49:15. The images below are just after a rapid anti-clockwise rapid 90° rotation, taken five minutes earlier. It still shows a partial semi-vertical shadow line in the lower right image. If there was remaining light — two rapid 90° rotations, in both directions would of been captured. This is about NASA. Moon landings never happened. Rapid 90° Lunar rotations debunk all Moon jabber no matter what formula is used.

Above, September, 2023 original RAW NEF files, all captured in horizontal format, showing one rapid 90° anti-clockwise rotation occurred just before the Moon totally faded away. Added brightness has been added to these images. All eight images were captured between 5° to 2° altitude in West, South West direction. Below are the RAW EXIF timestamp data for reference purposes — open files to enlarge.

This anti-clockwise super rapid 90° rotation occurred between 03:42:05 to 03:43:49 — that's one minute 44 seconds from when lower left ARN8278.NEF and lower right ARN8279.NEF were taken. What I do know, rapid 90° lunar rotations happen within split seconds — not minutes. There must be other street photographers out there, who may have also taken multiple lunar captures, without knowing they've captured rapid rotational events. Check your old RAW files. I can't believe I'm the only person capturing rapid 90° rotations, since 2016 — or am I?.

Even Top Flat Earthers Don't Believe - Smoking Gun Evidence.

"Nobody has ever seen the moon rotate like you are claiming" — Flat Earth Dave - Dec. 2023

Anyone should be able to capture rapid 90° rotations, if time and effort is put into it. Whether in still or video, this requires time and patience, not just simply taking 10 second video clips, and you're done. Anyone thinking this way will become disappointed quickly giving up. Discrediting still photographers is nothing knew. The majority of flat earthers are videographers and wouldn't careless about grainy composition subpar quality stills. The Nikon P1000 point & shoot and smartphone junk are known to produce soft stills — when cropped and enlarged. In saying that, some flat earthers get full credit for doing their own detailed research surveys on curvature exposing the heliocentric model i.e. world acclaimed astrophysicist, Dr Svetlana Berdyugina interview. Austin Witsit heated debate with a Methodist Freemason. Let's not forget Joe Rogan, a once anti-NASA lunar landing podcaster, now a highly paid gatekeeping heliocentric shill — follow the money -- just a liar. Everything revealed on space fakery in one video clip.
Again, it's about timing and location. As of December 2023, flat earth Dave is correct, no one else has ever made claim capturing 90° rotations, except for myself — globally. Am I placing myself out on a limb here? Not at all. The images shown are real time captures — not make believe fakes.

RAW NEF image captures — no matter the subject matter holds its own digital footprint data at the time it was captured.

Above, super rapid 90° clockwise and anti-clockwise rotations captured on November 09 2022. Rotation times as follows, there was 0.46 seconds between images DSC0788 and DSC0789 of a clockwise 90° rotation occurring. There was 0.35 seconds between images DSCO791 and DSC0792 of an anti-clockwise rotation occurring. In total time, both 90° rotations happened in 3 minutes 44 seconds. NEF image DSC0790 taken @6:19:36 wasn't required here. The above 90° rotations are 2 occurrences of 8+ rapid 90° rotations captured since 2016, by the website owner. It's impossible to debunk my images and data, because they are real. Whether you believe it or not makes no difference.

Original RAW NEF EXIF Data of each image — All image captures were taken in Horizontal Format (DX 6000 x 4000)

The above RAW NEF image captures speak for themselves revealing dual 90° rotations occurred @18° East & 19° East

RAW images contain NEF EXIF timestamps when they were exactly taken. As mentioned, rapid 90° Lunar rotations happen within seconds — not minutes. It also tells you, no one could survive these rapid rotations, that suddenly occur through 24 hour cycles. This also tells you, absolutely no one or anything has landed on the Moon. With decades of deceptive programming, through numerous mind control programs, the difficulty of waking up, for some, is past the point of no return — even when looking at more than enough evidence and data. People who do wake up, begin researching down rabbit holes, looking for other hidden truths. We have been living in a prison planet controlled by powerful gatekeepers for centuries. Today, it's the globalists turn orchestrating the next reset. Their agenda of depopulation has already begun. This is what happens when allowing little humans acting out as elevated Gods ruling over mankind.

Above, December 2018 RAW NEF images in the original format and image file sequence when they were captured — horizontal 4800x3200. Images ARN6664.NEF and ARN6665.NEF plainly shows the Moon had rapidly rotated 90° in an anti-clockwise direction. The time between image captures was 1 minute 49 seconds. This rotation, like all other 90° rotations occur within seconds. Below, reference data.

One can show all the evidence with timestamp RAW NEF EXIF data, and people still won't believe it — It's called brain fog.

The above rapid 90° anti-clockwise rotation had rotated to this position within 1 minute 49 seconds between both image captures.

All my super rapid 90° Lunar rotation image captures have not, in any way been switched, turned, moved, re-positioned, photo-shopped, or manipulated with. The RAW EXIF data is 100% correct revealing timestamp and mode (horizontal or vertical position). Because of the rarity capturing rapid 90° rotations, in both directions, within minutes, will certainly create skeptical criticism. What can be said outright, since 2016, I've captured the best smoking gun evidence of all time, nothing man made has been to the Moon. And also revealing what the Moon has been doing secretively within obscurity since it was created — rapidly rotating at certain times. Below, for evidence reference, original RAW NEF image captures 28 September, 2023 — one rapid 90° anti-clockwise rotation had occurred during fading.

Images ARN8278 NEF & ARN8279 NEF were both captured in horizontal format, as were all other image captures taken during this still photo shoot (Sept 28 2023). Below, enlarged NEF files from above files in sequence order, for reference only, visibly showing a rapid 90° anti-clockwise rotation had occurred in image 8279. ©RH

My proof rapid 90° rotations do occur at East and West directions. The above 90° rotation was captured at 3° West, South West. 

Below, Raw data EXIF files of above ARN8278 NEF & ARN8279 NEF showing both images were captured in horizontal format (4800x3200), including time stamp data when they were exactly captured — 03:42:05 & 03:43:49. That's one minute 44 seconds between captures, a rapid 90° anti-clockwise rotation occurred. Just because no one else has captured these events, they are not rare events. These rapid 90° rotations happen through 24 hour cycles. This requires to be at the right locations to capture such events. What this means, rapid 90° rotations may have already occurred before visibility, or after fading at that location. I have named these rotations HEMI 90° as credit capturing them since 2016. It's now 2024. depending on location I'm at the mercy of weather conditions, let's see what can be captured through the year.

Below, images ARN8278 NEF & ARN8279 NEF Metadata in Lightroom showing matching dimension format (horizontal), time both images were captured, including camera gear used. Note, all my rapid 90° rotational Lunar captures 2016 onward, contain original RAW EXIF data of when each individual still image was taken.

The below half-cropped still images show Moon change position after rapid 90° rotations. Left ARN6637 NEF and right ARN6638 NEF. images were taken at 02:14:12 and at 02:15:04. There was 0.52 seconds between captures. These captures, including all above image captures of rapid 90° clockwise, anti-clockwise rotations, places NASA Moon landings and other supposed space junk landing on the Moon finally to rest — What do you think? The closest captures I've taken, before and after a rapid 90° rotation occurred, is 0.13 seconds. It only took 47 years from the first moon landing of discovering this, placing lunar landings down the toilet. This includes lunar space junk from NASA affiliates, Russia, Israel, China and India to question.
Rapid rotations occur suddenly during first visibility, and when fading through the Moon's 24 hour orbital path. These occurrences can happen while the Moon is passing across oceans and continental landmass. At any location, it takes time and effort to capture rotational occurrences. Rotations may have already happened just before visibility, or just after fading. Don't expect radiant bright sharp captures at these timelines. Also, one has to equate, that 500+ kilometers further East or West may capture rapid 90° rotations occurring. It's all about location and timing!   

Above and further below, yes, you're seeing double — dual clockwise rapid 90° rotations with both rotations occurring within 20 minutes. This off course includes one anti-clockwise 90° rotation, which occurred between 02:25:54 to 02:27:43.

All still Lunar captures have either been taken in Horizontal or in Vertical format — without turning the camera body or lens changing format dimensions. Switching from DX to FX (full frame) using the same horizontal or vertical format during Lunar shoots, is occasionally done. All rapid 15° & 90° clockwise anti-clockwise rotations on this page have been taken by the website owner.
Any data on anything today must show enough substantial evidence claiming the data presented is real. Not recycled copy and paste snippets from other people's work. The images and data of exposing rapid 90° Lunar rotations presented here, is from my own work effort. Some important questions arise 1. Why hasn't NASA revealed these 90° rotations happen? 2. If NASA and their affiliated enterprises know these rapid 90° rotations occur, why the secrecy? What would be the reasons for hiding such occurrences like this?
A quick reminder to everyone. Your very first source of information and data about anything on rapid 90° Lunar rotations, originated from still image captures, and RAW NEF EXIF timestamp data, right here on this page, captured by the website owner — Rick Hemi.
Do avoid being an image website thief using my images elsewhere online without permission or prior consent — contact All my photographic work on this website hasn't been placed here for other websites, YouTubers, Social Media platforms, and especially Podcast platforms self-helping themselves using my images for their own personal Ego acclaim and gain. Best advice, there's more than enough information on this page how to capture your own rapid lunar rotations. In other words, if I can do it numerous times, so can anyone else!
This is all about respecting other people's work, no matter what they've self-published. That's why you'll be hard-pressed finding anything through this entire website that belongs to anyone else. You'll will also notice there are no sponsors or donation requests — a rarity today. Anyone found using my images, screenshots of images, parts of images, Photoshop of images, cloned parts of images, will automatically be placed within the "image website thief" page without hesitation.        

15° Clockwise Anti-clockwise Rotations.

Most People don't believe what they observe with their own eyes, even when there's evidence proving what they're seeing.

Lunar snaps from October 2016. As we know, the Moon gradually rotates clockwise through 24 hour cycles. What most don't know, or even recognize, the Moon suddenly rotates anti-clockwise during 24 hour gradual clockwise rotations. Directional clockwise anti-clockwise rotations I've personally captured are either 15° or 90°. There is no time clock knowing when clockwise anti-clockwise rotations occur — They just suddenly happen. The above 15° clockwise anti-clockwise rotation occurred between images DSC9049 and DSC9050 (7 minutes 57 seconds), and between images DSC9050 and DSC9053 (3 minutes 17 seconds). In total both 15° rotations occurred in 11 minutes 13 seconds.The above still captures were taken in RAW NEF containing original EXIF timestamp data. DSC9051, DSC9052 weren't required here.        

Capturing images in RAW NEF automatically holds all EXIF data of images, and cannot be changed or modified in any way.

Between NEF image @04:59:03 and NEF image @05:00:37 (one minute 34 seconds) the moon had rapidly rotated 15° anti-clockwise. The moon's normal slow clockwise rotation continued through the night totaling 180° degrees with no other rapid rotations occurring.

Moon Struck  - East To West Perspective View

Perspective view from East to West at the same location has nothing to do with Lunar rotation movements.

If it's easy enough videoing Lunar movement activity from one day to the next, why then hasn't NASA produced a single live Earth video?

In general, photographers and videographers share the same basic principals taking stills and video — aperture, speed and focus. As long as whatever is being captured, the prime initiative is about the finished quality. Apart from that nothing much else requires tweaks or changes, everything is good to go. It's only by chance when discovering, or searching for unusual occurrences, some further digging begins. The above videos are examples. There is nothing much abnormal with both videos when each video is individually viewed. It wasn't until taking screenshots matching up images form both videos to spot Lunar movements. From one day to the next. the Moon showed rotational changes. How many videographers research their own Lunar videos like above? Probably none. Top left video was taken @22° West at 4:18am, Feb. 24th. Top right video was taken @12° East at 7:19pm, Feb. 25th. They show a substantial amount of clockwise rotational movement between both videos. Viewing Lunar videos taken from the East and West direction when individually viewed will in most cases hide certain amounts of Lunar movement activity. The majority of Lunar movements are not visibly seen with the naked eye or binoculars.
Best advice — sift through your previous stills and videos comparing Lunar angles and positions.

Perspective angle of view from East to West has little to no connection to rotational movement. They are two separate occurrences that may or may not show Lunar movement during Lunar cycles. Above, Images examples showing different Lunar positions at the western side,

Above top left 21° East, Jan 2024. Above top right, 2am, 28° West, Jan 2024, 15 hours later — Perspective from East to West.

It's advisable when taking multiple Lunar images to remain in either in vertical or horizontal format. What I normally do, is to first take a couple of snaps of the Moon partially cropped out of the frame. This identifies the direction and position of the Moon for reference later.  

A 15° anti-clockwise rotation occurred between image captures. This has nothing to do with the perspective view East to West. The obvious  reasons backing up this claim, are the numerous image captures taken at the same altitude levels through different cycles showing no rotational movement. Below images are the original RAW NEF files (3200 x 4800).

Those believing Moon flipping on the other side of a 'globe earth model' haven't done any serious research of Lunar movement rotations occurring within their own neighborhood. The Moon during its orbital path, is constantly rotating anti-clockwise, clockwise, at times rapidly, and even shifting, moving further away or closer inward, while remaining on the same orbital path. Every location, no matter the continent should reveal some of these occurrences happening. It takes time and effort capturing this kind of data. Breaking decades of educational pseudo-science begins by observing Lunar movements that are occurring within your own region. Best advice, get some camera gear (not smartphone junk), and begin taking lunar shots through different Lunar phases at your location. You'll be surprised what can be captured within a short time period.

The Moon as we've been told rarely side tilts, or rotates through cycles — really? They say angular perspective view from East to West gives the impression the Moon looks as if it has rotated 180°. This is correct, but not when Lunar movements occur at the same East or West directions having the same approximate elevation levels. Examples of Lunar side tilt and rotational movement from month to month.   

Shadow lighting during Lunar cycles creates the illusion as if the Moon remains in a fixed position without rotational movement.   

The Moon during Lunar cycles from week to week, month to month side tilts and rotates. The  above RAW NEF files show angular tilt and 15° clockwise rotation. Images were taken at the same location using the same photo gear @18° & 22° elevation ESE. Both captures were taken approximately on the same timeline (03:23am 03:43am) on Feb 5th & March 5th. This rules out angular perspective view. Most will right this off who follow a heliocentric globe model, relating it to Earth axis angular tilt. In saying that, It makes more sense the Moon simply side tilts and rotates in both anti-clockwise and clockwise directions on its own accord. Best advice, capture multiple Lunar images during different cycles at the nearest timeline and elevation levels. Below, full frame DSLR in DX format producing a 15MP image.  

Inward Outward Lunar Movements - Diameter Size Changes

Capturing these occurrences require using the same photo gear at the same location at the same elevation angle.

Above, original RAW NEF file size captures as they were taken at 5% & 23% phases, using the same photo gear and RAW format dimensions (DX 4800 x 3200) at the same location — November 11 & November 14, 2020. They show no change in Moon diameter size.

From one day to the next @79° West, 53° West — same location, same DX horizontal format, same prime lens.

The above images are original RAW NEF file size captures as they were taken, at 21.9% & 14% phases, using the same photo gear, at the same location, in RAW format (4800 x 3200) July 16 & July 17, 2020. From one day to the next, the Moon had moved further back from its closer position in top left ARN 7400. The diameter change is considerable, approximately 1/3rd of its size. Because both images were captured within 24 hours of each other, Pedigree and Apogee timelines are ruled out. 

Was it Earth moving, rotating, spinning further away from one day to the next, or was the Moon just simply moving further back on its orbital path? One things for sure, if the Earth moved this distance further away from the Moon, global population would of felt landmass movement. Images Nikkor 800 5.6 AIS prime DX format.  

Lunar captures ARN7400 and ARN7405 were taken at the same location, using the same size image format (DX 4800 x 3200), with the same fixed prime lens (800 5.6 ED AIS), the same camera body, at the same approximate angle and height. The above images are the original file sizes with no changes to width or height with no cropping or enlarging alterations. ARN7405 NEF image shows, the Moon had moved a considerable distance further back from its closer position within a 15 hour time frame between captures. This is one of many occurrences of what the Moon is doing through 24 hour cycles. It includes movements of slow 15° and 90° rapid rotations, in anti-clockwise, clockwise directions. Capturing Lunar shots on other continents will give different Lunar movement activity.   
And no, this is not Moon wobble gibberish, or outlandish perceptions by scientists in lab coats. What this tells you, the Moon remained on its orbital path while moving further back on that orbital path. It's simple as that. Nothing complicated here, although probably difficult to digest, by 99% of global population. That's what decades of brainwashing pseudo-science and CGI fake space has accomplished — A false fake reality of make believe. RAW EXIF Data of the above images are added below for reference purposes.

Also, between captures, the Moon's light source angle direction and rotational position had changed. The Moon image at 14%, has a 90° anti-clockwise position compared to the previous day.

Photo gear — D800 body, Nikkor 800 5.6 ED AIS prime lens, DX horizontal format @79° West & 53° West — same location.

The Moon's diameter size, is clearly seen smaller in ARN7405. Again, these are original RAW NEF file sizes above, taken with the same photo gear (800 5.6 prime) at the same location using the same DX horizontal format (4800 x 3200) at 08:29, July 16th and 11:55, July 17th 2020. What caused this drastic change in diameter size? No matter what heliocentric globe earth model axis calculations are used, the Moon's diameter size change will not correlate to the amount of Moon movement that has occurred within a 15 hour timeline. Logically, the Moon moved further outward from it's closer position from the previous day on the same orbital path.

NASA says, they landed astronauts on the Moon. The problem with that whole scenario, are the continuous slow rotations, the inward outward positional movements, including the fast rapid 90° rotations, occurring in both clockwise and anti-clockwise directions through 24 hour cycles. This would apply anyone or anything on the Lunar surface would have experienced these events — and not survived. These two images reveal, one of many hidden deceptions powerful gatekeepers don't want you to know about. Non-stop chem-trailing, since the 1960s clouding the skies has nothing to do with this —right? Just inconvenient coincidences blocking out clear visibility above horizons during dusk and dawn. No conspiracy fetishes here. It's about what you do know compared to what you don't know.
The only way of finding these hidden events, is by getting out yourself capturing still images using the same exact photo gear, at the same locations comparing image captures from one day to the next, during Moon cycle phases passing through your location. Just because you may get the same diameter sizes doesn't imply there's no abnormal Lunar occurrence happening at your location. There is no timeline when occurrences like this happen. Best advice — try again, and again, at different timelines and intervals.
My own image captures are proof of this. Like previously mentioned, I'm not your Lunar Moon guru. I'm just like other people out there, sharing and showing real time still image captures I've personally taken — Not regurgitated images found online taken by others. What I do know, and have captured, since 2016, the Moon does rapidly rotate 90° in both directions without warning, and also moves its position further out, or closer inward while moving on the same orbital path. What this means, the Moon has hidden cycles of events that are occurring at certain timelines through 24 hour phases.
Best advice — still image captures should be taken in RAW using the same image format dimensions, remaining in horizontal or vertical, using the same photo gear at the same location. This also includes having Lunar angles at the same degree and height.    

Original Lunar diameter sizes from one day to the next — The Moon had moved further away between these captures. 

Below, original RAW NEF Lunar sizes, using the same format (DX 4800 x 3200), at the same location, using the same photo gear at the same height and angle. With the above mentioned, perspective view can be ruled out no matter what formula is used. Forget about heliocentric earth rotation angle causing the moon's diameter enlargement. What makes more logic? The moon's location moved further inward while remaining on the same orbital path. It's simple as that with zero pseudo-science jabber. With decades of programmed education, we take the moon for granted, as what is being told. Keeping fake space indoctrination at peak levels must continue at all costs. It's not until one begins researching themselves, on their own accord, of the many discrepancies of the heliocentric model. Nothing makes sense, nothing adds up, and most of all, nothing man-made has been beyond low earth orbit. If the controlling gatekeepers of earth could accomplish blanketing out the entire sky — they wouldn't hesitate doing it!

The opposite of pseudo-science? Everything above us has been constantly moving, rotating on fixed orbits and timelines through the centuries with no adjustments. That's something people in lab coats with multiple science degrees can never design or create — and they know it. Above and below, image captures showing the Moon constantly rotates, and moves inward or further outward, causing diameter size changes during cycles while remaining on the same orbital path — It's guaranteed you didn't learn that at school. You either follow believing pseudo-science doctrine, NASA fakery, or believe what you're seeing from your own image captures.

Perspective viewing angle from East to West shows the Moon had rotated 180° between captures from Feb 5th to Feb 14.

Lunar snaps above and below showing varying Lunar movements and diameter change sizes. Many believe the Moon orbits without rotating, in either clockwise, anti-clockwise directions, including closer or further away positional changes. The above Lunar snaps show a 180° rotational change between a new Moon. Images were taken at the same location at 13°SE & 15°W. Most will not believe what they're looking at below, placing it as impossible occurrences. My image captures break decades of indoctrinated fake space programming.
Again, no conspiracy here. There are too many captures using the the same camera, prime lens, format size, and angle height while being at the same locations. Best advice, instead of just Moon gazing, observe what the Moon is actually doing at your own location.

Why hasn't there been more jabber talk on these kind of occurrences? First, who is actually going to go through their image files measuring Moon diameters from one day to the next? Most won't even recognize small diameter changes in their files.  Almost everyone capturing waxing waning Lunar shots are only interested in the best looking image capture discarding the rest, usually deleting the remaining RAW files. I've done this myself in the past. Also. the majority of Lunar shots at this diameter size are cropped and enlarged from their original RAW files without acknowledging, if that capture was different in diameter size from the day before. In other words, there's insufficient data on these specific occurrences. Best advice — check your old waxing waning files that haven't been deleted. Take ample Lunar captures when at 25% and lower, at your own location and other locations. This involves at least four days on each side of any new Moon. Use the exact same photo gear at each location i.e. the same camera body, the same prime lens, the same image size (FX or DX) and format (horizontal), and the same approximate angle degree elevation at East and West directions. A friendly reminder, you've probably first heard about this data from this website, by the website owner — Rick Hemi.
Below, two lunar images placed side by side — what do you notice? In general, still photographers are only interested capturing tack sharp images, especially of the Moon. Normally, a dozen stills are taken within quick succession with the best image or images chosen and the rest discarded. There maybe instances when comparing past Lunar still captures for contrast, color and sharpness valuation. This is a normal procedure without observing anything beyond that point. In other words, there is minimal focus comparing previous Lunar shots for rotational and tilt movements. It's not until previous captures are placed on top of each other, or side by side noticing diameter changes. It's here when comparing image captures, when taken with the same photo gear of Lunar movement activity.      

Capturing Rapid 90° Lunar Rotations  - Use Real Photo Gear!

Don't expect capturing abnormal lunar movements using smartphone junk!

Above, typical lunar fading @3° - 0° West during daybreak. The original RAW file appears to struggle capturing visuals of the Moon. Even observing the Moon with binoculars or the naked eye at this time is lost. This is one reason why I personally take stills instead of video during West fading. Videoing is completely useless, a waste of time! A few clicks of enhancement adjustments in post-processing of the above original still file brings out the Moon (top right). At one location, in 2023, I did capture a single 90° anti-clockwise rotation at the same elevation level as above.

The majority of photographers have already packed up their camera gear well before snaps like above are taken. West fading lunar captures at low elevation levels lose all sharpness. Typical grainy exposures can't be helped at these times.     

Depending on location, visibility, and atmospheric density will determine what photo gear being used, is able to capture before and after shots of rapid 90° rotations. It may take numerous attempts, which can become monotonous, but rewarding when rotations are captured. Forget about using smartphone junk or point and shoots. Grain, fuzz, and blur will result, even with the P1000. This video clip shows the bad side of the P1000. All those fragile gadgets in that clip require battery juice. My classic 1986 Nikkor 800 5.6 ED AIS prime and D800 has captured most of my Lunar shots seen through this website, without the need of being stacked. Low light just visible Lunar captures shown on this page, is not about getting sharp perfect brilliant captures here. Pushed ISO and wide aperture will do the job. Most important of all, is to continuously take shots with minimal lag-time between exposures. By doing this, it will give the closet time rate between shots that may reveal 90° rotations occurring at your location, within seconds — not minutes. Purchasing camera gear, especially good quality second hand prime lenses can be done at KEH USA

Know your camera, lenses and cropping limitations. This grainy non-stacked D800 DX crop from a full moon image, is here for that reason. The original image size before being cropped, is perfect. Enlarging, cropping from already smaller format sized image files may end up looking nasty, subpar down to the level of smartphone camera junk. As most know browsing this website, it avoids using smartphone images — for anything, unless as a last resort, which is rare. In saying that, Nikon's best DSLR bodies, for still photography, started and ended between 2007 to 2016. Since then, DSLR camera bodies began down grading to cheaper tacky consumer made designs. The D780, which was used for 12 months, is one of them. The D780, was nothing more than a hybrid smartphone inside a DSLR body. The majority of videographers wouldn't know the difference between a good quality single still image capture compared to a tacky screen grab image from video. That's how plasticity the entire photographic world has now become — a multi-stacked collection of subpar images rendered as one image. A down to earth video of a D800 body with 350k clicks review from 2020.

The RAW NEF lunar captures above were taken using the same shutter speed, 1/30th second @5.6 under 20 minutes. The first three rows of images to ARN8783 were taken in horizontal FX with the rest in horizontal DX format. Turning camera and lens to vertical position during shoots is always avoided. This keeps all image captures in the same format. I personally use three second time delay with this heavy prime lens (5.5kg + body). Gradual adjustments are manually done on a wimberley head. It's not until 30-45 minutes later, aperture and faster shutter speeds maybe used. It's here within this time frame when rapid 90° rotations have occurred, and have been captured. On other continents, rapid 90° rotations may occur at complete;y different elevated levels.
It takes being up all night observing Moon movements from start to finish at your own location. Contacting other photographers 500 kilometers, due East or West, may capture these rotations occurring. It all depends on location! The above captures didn't reveal rotations at this particular location, which means, if rotations had happened, they had already occurred before image ARN8756 was taken. On the same evening at the fade side, 11 hours later, haze and cloud cover made any Lunar image captures impossible.  

There's more than enough real-time evidence rapid 90° lunar rotations occur through 24 hour cycles. I've stated this for numerous years now. As yet, I haven't calculated any serious pattern of when rapid 90° rotations happen during lunar cycles. There's certainly a definite rapid rotation cycle pattern. Everything has it's own unique series of events, in some instances occurring just beyond our vision of sight. Until then, more lunar captures are required, at different locations across continents. Starting at 95%, before full through to 95%, after full, is recommended. It also requires shooting at uninteresting dim, almost transparent opaque Moons.
Do 90° rotations occur through all Moon phases? Put it this way, if rapid 90° rotations happen during full Moon (97% on either side), it's more than logical they also occur through other phases. Low light to almost no light visibility during waning, waxing phases makes this difficult to capture. What is more interesting at these timelines, are Moon diameter size changes. This requires comparing images from one day to the next captured at the same degree height, using the exact same camera gear, at the same location. The Moon cannot expand or shrink its diameter size. What's happening, is the Moon is either moving further away or closer inward while remaining on the same orbital path.     

NOTE: Depending where you are located, rapid 90° rotations may have already occurred just before the Moon becomes fully visible, or just after the Moon fades within atmospheric density. The information given here, is to also help others capturing images of these occurrences. I used to be skeptical thinking I was wasting my time until more rapid 90°rotations were captured. One can either remain ignorant, or get out and capture what I've captured. 

First visibility of the Moon varies from location to location. At times a glimpse can be late above 10° elevation. This is caused by different layers of atmospheric density. Personally, the appropriate timelines have been through the fall and winter months capturing abnormal Lunar occurrences. It's best avoiding mountainous regions, due to accumulating fog, mist and cloud. A close second are industrial zones and polluted cities. Remaining at sea level locations is recommended. It's also normal procedure scouting for good locations in advance.  

Depending on location, capturing Lunar snaps at 3° West and below over certain landmass may or may not be achievable. It's best to check at locations if at all possible. Poor visibility from daylight, pollution and atmospheric density are normal issues.      

Expect grainy subpar image captures at low altitude levels, especially at fade times no matter what camera gear is used. The below snap, an example at 3° altitude, 10 minutes before total fading. The Moon didn't set below any horizon at this location, as in most instances. The Moon is simply moving further beyond visibility at any location. Anyone 500-1000 kilometers further west would still observe the Moon above 20° elevation. One rapid 90° anti-clockwise rotation had occurred at 3° west, south west in 2023. Spending time taking grainy image captures of the Moon just before fading at any location is more rewarding than what most think.  

The above and below image stills were taken at the same location at the same time using two camera rigs positioned only meters a part of the Moon @6° ESE. The perspective position even within only a few meters changes dramatically. The tower beacon light was approximately 1.5 - 2km away. Captures of any lunar rotation with foreground stationary objects or with cloud movement would be 100% proof of visual lunar activity, This is easier said than done at any location. How do I know this? I've tried countless times, even with two camera rigs, one for stills, the other for video. At this location, the Moon @97% didn't reveal abnormal activity from 3° to 16° altitude. In other words, any lunar rotation activity may have already occurred before visibility at this particular location. It all relates down to location and timing!

Solving stiff neck syndrome with older model DSLR bodies when pointed at elevated levels, is avoided using an angle viewfinder. The DR-5 works perfectly, especially when the Moon's position is up at 12 o'clock. The DR-5 has precise focusing at both 1X & 2X magnification. Nikon got this design right — Rating 10/10. The D800, now 14 years old has captured most of the images on this page. The shutter count as of Jan 2024 has reached 20K — Rating 9/10.  

How are your camera batteries? I've mentioned several times OEM batteries have longer life spans than third party junk. The OEM EL-EN15 batteries below, were purchased in 2012 with the D800. All 3 batteries still have a 100% charge cycle. That's 11+ years of service offshore. The need of backup batteries when out and about, especially when at remote locations is paramount. Without a tripod and reliable batteries most of the images on this page wouldn't exist. OEM accessories rating 10/10. The DSLR D800 also gets a 10/10 rating for reliability. All Lunar shots with the D800 are taken in DX mode producing 16MP RAW file images.  

I know what you're thinking. Why would anyone still travel using an old heavy full metal manual focus lens in the 2020s? Why not travel instead with more modern lighter weight camera gear? The reasons are many. This particular prime lens has quality optics, 3 being ED. The focusing ring is smooth and precise. Magnification matches or surpasses some of my newer AFS lenses. Quality build is good as it gets. The tripod collar is perfectly designed positioned in the right place and could probably tow a truck. Nikon doesn't make quality built lenses like this anymore. To finish, there were only 3004 of these lenses produced by Nikon. It's highly probable, over 85% of these primes, since 1986, have been butchered, dropped, or worn out used for parts. Sports photographers working on wages throughout the 1980s & 90s, are the same as they are today — reckless with stuff they don't own. The 800 5.6 has survived for weeks on end in extreme subzero temps at high altitudes (—33C 4400M). The lens has also been used in boiling temps surpassing +50C. With this lens, it's one shot at a time. There's no rush, or the need to panic. Simply get focus and take the shot.
For those into astro-video, the Nikon P1000 is probably the best portable point and shoot camera. Long distant still shots with the P1000 are subpar quality. What did you expect with a tiny smart phone sensor. In saying that, purchasing a dozen P1000 cameras, each with spare batteries and remote, before this model is discontinued, is an investment that can reap 1/3 more on each camera after two years of the camera's discontinuation. Far more profit than idle cash sitting in banks getting poor interest rates. Is it a risk? Maybe, maybe not. One things for sure, those out there already using P1000 cameras will certainly purchase another P1000 when their own fails, or requires OEM parts which are unavailable. What's the best investment in the mid-2020s? Gold & Silver. 

For those into astro-video, the Nikon P950 & P1000 are probably the best portable point and shoot cameras. Long distant still shots with the P1000 are subpar quality. What did you expect with a tiny smart phone sensor. In saying that, purchasing a dozen P1000 cameras, each with spare batteries and remote, before this model is discontinued, is an investment that can reap 1/3 more on each camera after two years of the camera's discontinuation. Far more profit than idle cash sitting in banks getting poor interest rates. Is it a risk? Maybe, maybe not. One things for sure, those out there already using P1000 cameras will certainly purchase another P1000 when their own fails, or requires OEM parts which are unavailable. What's the best investment in the mid-2020s? Gold & Silver.

Below, at times capturing lunar shots is with any lens already attached to camera bodies  — 1981 80-200 AIS manual zoom FX mode.     

For straight out still photography, almost any DSLR full frame body, 12MP up combined with lenses 600mm up will capture quality lunar shots. Forget about smartphone junk. Smart phones require the aid of binoculars and telescopes capturing Moon shots. That's how useless smartphone junk is. Smartphones are nothing more than cameras for wannabe photographers that aren't really photographers, and probably spend most of their time, addicted to likes and swiping on social media platforms. If you need to be liked in the world we live in, you need a lifestyle reality check. Below, screen grab from DSLR video.

Emergency Landings - Flight Paths

Air flights fly straight, always using the shortest route from point A to point B. The above, an Air India Boeing 777 non-stop flight from Delhi to San Fransisco made an emergency landing in Magadan, Russia, June 2023. Now, why would this jet turn north, and avoid landing at much closer airports? Seoul, South Korea, Osaka, Tokyo, Sapporo, Japan, Kharbarosk, Russia, including the Midway Islands (USA) were all in range. Instead, the jet flew further direct north, landing at Magadan. This doesn't make sense, until looking at an 1892 Gleasons map. Magadan was the nearest available airport within this region during its flight path to make that emergency landing. When you see the fakery of what we have been led to believe  — the above begins to make sense. The Gleason's map shows south in every direction from North. North is center, also known as Rupes Nigra (BlackRock), directly in line with Polaris. What do you find past 60° south? A higher plateau, aka extra landmass, extra terra. NASA have been gatekeepers of Antarctica since 1958. A total ban to freely travel to this region began in 1959. Shortly after became the greatest deflection and deception of all mankind — Going to the Moon. Since the 1960s, NASA has kept the Moon, Mars propaganda program at full throttle — Just don't look at Antarctica. Because if you do, you'll suddenly wake up understanding you've been deceived and constantly lied to. The Gleasons map was removed from schools and libraries in 1957.

High in the sky, commercial & cargo jets in transit @30, 000 feet flying the shortest route from A to B.

Next time onboard a long haul flight (Aussie to Chile, Japan to Brazil), some may suddenly realize jets are flying straight. There is no altitude compensation drop adjusting for curvature. All jets at 30,000 feet altitude fly straight. The only movements onboard jets, is turbulence. If jets were dropping 2,777 feet per minute @500 MPH adjusting for curvature — You would feel it!

Flat Earthers commonly use southern flight paths flying to northern hemisphere locations, before continuing onward to southern hemisphere destinations. It's as if there are no flight connections from South America directly to Australia, South Africa etc. This is totally incorrect. Just to confirm, there are direct non-stop flights, which I've personally used connecting to southern destinations without crossing the equator — Auckland, NZ to Buenos Aires direct non-stop (1988). Sydney to Jo-Burg, South Africa direct non-stop (2007). Sydney via Auckland, NZ to Santiago, Chile direct non-stop (2009). Melbourne to Jo-Burg, South Africa direct non-stop (2011).

Even migratory birds from all land based continents know which direction south is. They never get lost flying south for obvious reasons. Compasses point towards the North Pole, every other direction away from the North Pole is South. East and West are circle positions located around the center point of North. Try finding that on Google — You can't.

Everything you see from NASA is fake space - 4 min video - James Webb telescope deep field image #18 36 TOID 1The image above took minutes creating a fake. .As a long time street photographer traveling the planet, one quickly recognizes fake modified images. NASA has plenty of experience of doing just that. NASA greens screen CGI images are as good as Disney and Hollywood. NASA has been fooling the planet since 69. Every image NASA has taken of their moon landings avoid showing stars. There are obvious reasons for not showing stars. Let's put it another way, If I can capture stars anywhere from earth, even with moonlight visible, the ease of capturing lunar shots with stars from the moon's surface is child's play.

With all the advanced technology, NASA hasn't been able to show 24hr live stream of the Earth's entire landmass — We know why!

Real time vivid crystal clear images of the entire Earth's landmass structure past low earth orbit don't exist. But capturing crystal clear images of Mars, Saturn, Jupiter, and beyond is no problem. Apollo astronauts go into recluse, bearing their guilt of lies and coverups until death. Like Hollywood Disney productions, Nixon chatting to Armstrong by landline in 1969, 240,000 miles away — with minimal lag time reveals how deep the NASA rabbit hole is. Deception — the use of deceit, the fact or state of being deceived, a ruse; a trick. NASA have been the gatekeepers of fake space since 1958. Rather, everything points beyond the 60°south international boundary buffer of Antarctica. It's all about Antarctica, not penguin colonies, not the ice wall, not the Moon or Mars, but what's hidden at 80° south from all directions of north. Open you mind  — flatten the curve

Image snaps taken at Doi Kio Lom (1735M) during the October 2014 Lunar eclipse. Back then, like most people, I never questioned or even bothered researching anything beyond the atmosphere. Everything taught and told was believed. The sun is 93 million miles away. NASA went to the Moon. Satellites speed through space capturing amazing images. Earth constantly spins 1000 MPH, rotating 66,000 MPH around the sun, including piles of other garbage all of us have been constantly bombarded with since we were kids. Anyone pushing a level plane Earth were nothing but brainless idiots. It wasn't until I decided to jump down rabbit holes myself looking at level versus curvature, perspective, density versus refraction, and looking beyond horizons etc. Rob Skiba — testing the globe 2015

Just like how we've been told lunar eclipses are caused by Earth's alignment, which is questionable. Shadows and light on the Moon's surface during Lunar phases and eclipses, are at different angles from what should be Earth, creating those angles. Recorded history dating back to the 15th century states more than 50 eclipses have occurred while both Sun and Moon have been visible above the horizon. There's something out there not visible to the naked eye, creating these shadows and curves. Whatever it is, it's by design. NASA has known this for decades keeping it secret. Anyone, whether people in white lab coats, in space programs, scientists, or anything on the 'solar system' within any circles of government, education and media, is now laughed at and ignored. Rabbit holes are many — Some ancient, many within the last century. The deception is so great, deprogramming one's mind takes self-critical thinking skills. Many prefer remaining ignorant on what really is a prison planet controlling their minds.

Image snaps, like millions of others have also captured, and probably sitting inside old hard drive storage. At times, not always, while the Moon rises, the Moon can suddenly rotate anti-clockwise. Image two clearly shows, a 15° anti-clockwise rotation, and remained in the position without correcting itself. Images three and four were also taken with the same prime lens, speed and aperture. A 10° anti-clockwise rotation occurred. Notice the Moon's shape changes in image four. Nothing massive here, like super rapid 90° rotations. There was one minute 34 seconds between images one and two, and three minutes 7 seconds between images three and four. Taking stills closer together will compress lesser time of before and after shots giving closer time stamps of rotations. Remember I'm not your personal Lunar guru, just a person showing how I've captured these anomalies with still captures. 

The above snaps are for viewing reference only. They show lunar rise and drop rotation movements over 24 hours. No rapid 90° rotations were captured here. Why is that? It's because at any given location, rapid 90° rotations may have already occurred before visibility. This also depends with atmospheric density at any location having clear visibility levels. Someone located 1000 miles further East or West of where the above images were taken may have captured rapid 90° rotations occurring. It's all about location and early approach and late lunar visibility. The possibilities of using video or time-lapse, instead of still captures, is like trying to catch tadpoles in deep ocean. The chances of catching 90° anti-clockwise, clockwise rotations before rotating can certainly be done with still captures. Video may only manage capturing half of the event. Rapid 90° rotations are not rare occurrences, as many assume. They are just extremely difficult to capture when they do happen, and normally during obscure opaqueness. You also have to think how much time you actually look at the Moon? For most, five minutes is more than enough. The majority of Moon buffs wait to photograph, video the Moon until clearly visible — which is then to late.   

East to West perspective view from different locations. What is important during lunar shoots, is to capture shots using the same format i.e. horizontal or vertical mode using the same camera gear (body and lens). Identifying how continuous selections of shots were taken, is easily confirmed by their original RAW EXIF <DateTimeOriginal> This places each individual image capture within its time sequence and lunar position. It's normal procedure when files are uploaded into post-processing libraries, images are automatically placed in their original position, time, date and sequence. Keeping original RAW files stored separately in external hard drives is recommended.  

Even with 20/20 vision, minor lunar movements are impossible to spot and usually go unnoticed. 

Top and below right GIF, stacked lunar snaps between 7pm to 9pm @16° to 35° south east showing clockwise perspective view from the same location. Most will not notice perspective angle changes within short time periods. It's not until the Moon has moved to the West when this is visibly noticed. You can understand it's much easier taking multiple stills rather than two hours of video time. Even when using video, small Lunar movements are difficult to spot. How many out there who actually spend time studying their own lunar captures is unknown. The simplest method, is stacking individual images from each lunar shoot from the same photo gear that was used. This is how I discovered my first rapid 90° clockwise anticlockwise rotation in 2016. There were no rapid rotation occurrences during this particular lunar phase — June 2023.

Get hypnotized for free. Top left, stacking image taken at the same elevation level, at the same location, using the same photo gear will reveal any abnormal lunar activity i.e. tilt, rotation and diameter size changes. Still captures are superior than video screen grabs. Below, some say lunar movements are nothing more than perspective view —really? Lunar movements do happen during different cycles month to month. The below images were both captured @14° west during 26% & 36% phases, at the same location using the same photo gear.

Something is always happening. When it happens people don't always see it happen, understand why it happened, and even reject that it did happen. That's how it always has been, the way it still is today, and will continue to be so in the future. Nothing really is what it seems to be, until it's personally seen with your own eyes. Below, the moon had rotated positions 90° clockwise to 90°anti-clockwise — under 12 minutes. The DSLR stills were originally captured in DX horizontal format (4800x3200). The normal reaction to these images will be as follows ' 'you simply just turned the image around', 'the changed position was modified in Photoshop', 'no one else has captured images like this, so they're fake'  etc. There's one full proof many forget. The original Raw timestamp data of each image when captured, including file dimension format of image stills i.e. horizontal or vertical. A well known 'flat earth' podcaster had sent his own images showing how easy it is to change/modify timestamp data. What he didn't realize, was the difference between <exif:DateTimeOriginal> and <xmp:CreateDate> This is how to identify original image files taken with cameras, and images redone, modified and changed. So what I'm saying here? I have the original <exif.DateTimeOriginal> Raw Nef files of the below stills. But in saying that, people will still not believe what they're seeing.. Skeptics will even place blame on the camera giving incorrect file data, or the images were taken sideways, or upside down. No matter how provable anything is beyond all doubt, nothing is believed.

It's Niburu - No, Just Lens Flare.

No, these snaps aren't revealing a hidden black sun, dual moon or what some follow, as Niburu. They are caused by typical lens flare from certain low quality camera lenses. The same issue also appears on a wide range of smartphone junk in video mode.

You'll notice this type of lens flare always occurs in the opposite direction of the subject matter (moon) when the subject matter is off center in the image. When subject matter is dead center, increased fogging, ghosting circling around the outside of the subject becomes more apparent. Best advice — use quality lenses.

The lunar shots above show stark differences of camera settings at 13° & 1° West elevations. Normal lunar settings are F11 & F8 with shutter speeds of 1/60 - 1/125, and ISO as low as possible. At certain locations, pushing ISO with wider apertures can't be avoided. The top right snap is an example of doing just that. At 1° degree elevation, sharpness is lost replaced with tons of grain.     

Typical city lunar snap within environments containing excessive light pollution, smog, foggy humid conditions, including chem cloud seeding. In the last few years I've witnessed the increase of chem cloud seeding released from unmarked jets through various continents.   

Big city light pollution looks like this.  There was actually a full Moon when taking this snap. At times, finding good locations at the wrong time happens. It's best scouting viewpoint locations days in advance, including weather conditions for Lunar visibility.    

Lens size matters for bird and wildlife, action and sport. For the best non-tacky Lunar shots use lenses having the most reach. Keeping the same format through each Moon shoot is recommended i.e. vertical or horizontal. Using DX mode with full frame FX bodies will increase magnification but lesson overall megapixels. For instance, a 36 MP full frame camera used in DX mode with full frame lenses will render images to 16MP. This is more than enough to get satisfying results. Top right, FX body DX mode prime lens.       

When using quality camera tripods, anything's possible to capture. Traveling with tripods through continents isn't a burden, as some may think. Tripods are as important as other photo gear for night shots, bird and wildlife, street photography and landscape.  

We all strive to get the best rewarding captures out of our photo gear. What hasn't changed, is lens quality. No matter what camera body is being used, whether DSLR or mirrorless, it's lens quality that counts. A pro 80MP camera body using subpar lenses will only capture what the lens is able to produce.

Cameras are unable to get more out of any image than what lenses can produce. Almost any camera using quality lenses will give good results — no mater the brand. The website owner doesn't promote any particular camera make or model. Only camera gear that has been personally used for reference only. Above, swinging the lens around at this particular location from West to East captured these shots.         

It's at your own risk taking Sun snaps above 20° elevation levels. Damage to your retina and camera sensors may result.

A quick snap of Venus during its transit path across the sun — June 2012. Venus has been recently video recorded with a P1000 showing similar waxing and waning phases just like the Moon — how about that?

According to various news media outlets, solar flare sun activity has increased since October 2023. The above image shows individual sun spots, including a large cluster of sun spots that can be seen with the naked eye below 6° elevation level — Nikkor 800 5.6 ED AIS.   

Overexposed, slight out of focus Moon shots look like this. Nothing wrong with camera gear here. User error is to blame. Simple distractions, and lack of concentration has no place in the middle of nowhere. Searching for clear views of Moon visibility and fade times are best done the day before. I use this website for Lunar phases. 

Top left, RAW NEF image taken well after moon fading. It was difficult locating the moon's position. Top right, the same RAW NEF adding brightness. Why is this burnt pixelated image being shown here? There is no horizon below the Moon @2° elevation. It places Earth curvature to question. The Moon captured at this location shows the Moon is simply moving further away on its orbital path without passing below any horizon. The sun is doing exactly the same, giving a false perspective view, as though the sun drops below horizons. No, both sun and moon fade away beyond and past our line of sight aka perspective view. Globe earth followers may need to read this twice.

Anyone today can capture images of the night sky with endless amounts of stars. NASA failed capturing one image with stars using Hasselblad 6x6 format cameras during Apollo moon landings. There are obvious reasons for this. NASA couldn't fake mock stars from their already mocked moon landings. NASA would of been caught out when image position of stars were matched from any location of stars taken from Earth. One thing that stands out during Apollo moon missions, is unbelievably obvious. Astronauts didn't mention — not once, how beautiful the Earth looked from their lunar viewpoint. Not a mention of stars. Instead, they were more interested picking up rocks, playing golf, and hooning around in a Wrangler Jeep chassis. A unit that seems far to large to fit onboard a landing module. For those searching secondary lighting sources, NASA had used in their Apollo staged missions, this has to be the best evidence — David Weiss video clip @ one minute ten seconds. As it is said, the better the images look of deep space, the more fake they are - Well done NASA. Do you still believe we went to the moon — Alex Michael : Nasa puppet show — Alex Michael

The above wasn't the only time Buzz said it didn't happen. Oxford Union Society, UK, live Q&A 'what was the scariest moment of the journey?' Buzz 'scariest...it didn't happen, it could've been scary', a few seconds later Buzz mutters 'circuit breaker'  What did Buzz mean saying circuit breaker? Probably Buzz was told he went off-breaking script. Video clip one Video clip two. Those who control the airwaves control the narrative. At times, truth slips out right in front of your face.

So many supposedly lunar modules have landed on the lunar surface, but no photo stills, or live video feed from Earth have never captured them independently outside the controllers of fake space  i.e. NASA space agencies and global fake space affiliates.

We live in a world of high-tech visual advancement. Today, distant subject matter can be spotted and captured from any island atoll and continental landmass. What has remained impossible, are image captures taken from Earth, of lunar modules arriving, orbiting or landing on the Moon. The suspicion increases when subpar live feed only from lunar modules, is all that's shown and shared to global populations. Animated cartoons is all we get — why is that? With billions of camera users and telescope buffs, including space observatories scattered throughout Earth's landmass, there's little to no proof any of these 'Lunar modules' ever existed beyond monitor screens. NASA can easily show deep space distant galaxies, but are unable to show any live-visual feed of lunar modules in transit to the Moon from Earth.   

We have been told the distance between the Moon and the Earth is 238,855 miles. The 2015 NASA image shows either the Earth or the Moon has distinctively moved much closer inward to create this perspective view compared to NASA's 1968 image. What's going on here? Top left 1968 NASA image, top right, NASA 'composite' video. 

perspective view between two solid objects with distinctive diameter sizes in front of each other remains the same.

Does anyone remember the original 1968 NASA image taken by Apollo 8 showing Earth, in its size, shape and form? Here it is here. What's wrong with that image? The heliocentric mileage distance and diameter circumference of the Apollo 8 image should have shown a much larger Earth landmass diameter size from that perspective viewing angle — no matter the camera gear used. Where is the original negative, including the other negatives taken in sequence from that particular roll film strip? Can you trust pre-developed images without the need of proving authenticity from the original negatives they were compiled from? This would prove outright the Apollo 8 image is authentic. Until that little issue, the Apollo 8 image, including all 1969 - 72 Lunar images were probably studio created at Canon Air Force base. Even if NASA admits their Moon landings were indeed faked, the pride of an entire nation will still believe the lie.      

1970s medium format 120 roll film cameras were cumbersome requiring external hand held metering and flash lighting in low light. 

Staged photography has been around since the dawn of roll film. Apollo Lunar still images show sharpness with minimal grain and perfect lighting effects with no over, underexposure. It is said, many Lunar images taken were non-usable — where are the original proof sheets? When single negatives are chosen, they will be selected from a roll of image strips good and bad. It was normal procedure to first place rows of negatives in their original size (6x6cm) (6x7cm) onto page size proof sheets. Only then would individual images be selected. How do I know this? I used to do this process with 35mm, 6x6cm, and 6x7cm negative and slide film during the 1980s & 90s.

Amateur and professional photographers alike,  capturing outdoor Images using medium 120 roll  film in the 1960s through to the 1980s dealt with varying exposure levels, and used external light meters. Even with quality controlled produced images within studio settings during that era, were by no means sharp crystal clear. This places NASA's 120 roll film images, taken by amateurs in space suits, beyond low earth orbit to question. Let's not forget, the 6x6 Hasselblad medium format cameras NASA had used were normal lenses. All NASA Lunar shots from that timeline look as if they have been professionally studio staged produced — take a look for yourself. Lunar snap by R.H.

Brainwashed by educators through the 1960s & 70s, we were told the Moon's light source was directly from the sun. We were also told Santa climbed down chimneys bearing gifts, and that tooth ferries were real. It's not until reaching adolescence the disbelieving of fables fade away. The cycle repeats itself retold again and again from one generation to the next. Educators today still regurgitate the same old jargon, auto-increasing brain fog with make believe pseudoscience i.e. the 1969-72 Moon landings happened. We're living on a spinning ball with 2/3rds covered in ocean mass hurtling at massive speeds through space. Antarctica is off limits to keep ice and penguins safe. Now with all the super advanced technology, there's still no 24hr live cam feed showing Earth's total physical landmass, only fake CGI cartoons. The reasons are obvious. Everything we're been told are deceptive lies, masterly managed and controlled by powerful gatekeepers within a multi-billion dollar fake space slush fund. Anyone with a brain using self-critical thinking will question the obvious. Why after many decades  there's still no camera video apparatus permanently fixed on the Lunar surface streaming live feed positioned directly at the Earth for the entire global population to see? Technology has fast caught up exposing all fake space programs. 

Typical random Lunar snaps taken through different time zones — DSLR camera gear.

Zoom, prime, long shots, tripod captures, quick snaps and cropped shots with DSLR FX & DX dinosaur cameras and lenses. As mentioned through the website, if camera gear works and functions the way it should — use it. Put it this way, if I can still capture award winning 1st prize images with a 2007 12MP D3 & 1986 800 5.6 ED AIS prime, anything's possible. The only cameras to avoid are wannabee cameras — smartphone junk! 

Overland travel photography is never boring, no matter the continent. All required is motivation and camera gear. A typical day begins strolling around taking random street snaps and people shots. By midday, nothing beats being within bustling markets and bazaars. A must do, is reaching the outskirts of towns taking images within engineering, automotive and MC workshops. After dark, it's about returning to certain locations capturing night shots and lunar snaps, just like above. No day is the same. Every town, city, urban or rural has its own vibe and atmosphere. Best advice  — brush up on your Interacting skills, travel with real camera gear and be motivated.    

Most looking at the above Lunar snaps won't even notice the Moon had rotated 5° anti-clockwise. Only those capturing numerous stills (not video) will identify these occurrences had happened. Stacking images, and using a degree wheel determines the amount of movement in either direction. These soft subpar snaps were taken direct West during fading at this particular location using wide aperture and pushed ISO. Perspective angle of view is ruled out here.   

Capturing reasonable Lunar shots below 16% visibility becomes difficult with most camera gear. Taking a dozen captures using different  apertures and shutter speeds will get at least one good shot out of the bunch. Stacking multiple captures may give better results. The Moon completely faded away within an hour from when this was taken. Atmospheric grain, like above, is normal during first light, and can be removed in post-processing.  

A decade old Lunar still snap, far better than using smartphone junk — 2014, Nikon 12MP D3S & 2x TC (400mm).

At this location, the last three image captures @5° W, were taken blind — pushed ISO, 1/15th of a second, 4800x3200.   

At times the Moon can give visual impressions looking less in percentage change. The above snap appears to be under 16%, more like 11%. This can be related to when stills are captured i.e. early East or late West.

It never gets boring capturing lunar stills. I've had the opportunity and enjoyment, just like many others taking random lunar shots at different locations through the continents.   

Heliocentric - Geocentric - Circular - Flat Earth — What's Real?

One thing's for sure, we live on solid landmass, flat or round. Rivers flow into lakes and oceans, both showing level surfaces. Liquid mass must be held and contained from expanding. Everything seen from land, sea and air show level horizons. When the Sun and Moon become visible, or when fading, it's the changing atmospheric density that slowly brings both into perspective view at that location. Do I personally believe in a flat Earth? Put it this way, by doing my own research, and using my own image content , I've discovered enough evidence acknowledging everything is level. Returning to the same locations, sometimes years later, the night sky of star positions are still rotating on the same orbital path. Polaris has never moved. I certainly don't feel in anyway upside down when walking on the streets in Melbourne, or when driving across the Nullabor Plain — Tierra del Fuego, Cape Town, Oban Stewart Island included. Is the Earth stationary? It would seem so for various reasons. 1. All I've felt through the decades are earthquakes, not the Earth's entire landmass moving, rotating through space at super massive speeds. 2. The stars have remained constant on their orbital paths, this placing Earth's landmass as a stationary fixed plain. Is the Earth round? We have all been educated to believe Earth is round, spinning through space. Issues arise when calculating Earth's physical continental landmass dimensions, especially the white elephant in the room — Antarctica. Until  that entire region has lifted the 1959 60th south parallel off-limit restrictions, no one knows Earth's real physical dimensions. It's understood by many today, who are aware of powerful gatekeepers controlling what they allow us to know, and what we shouldn't know. Earth;s rabbit hole has been purposely designed to be as deep, as it is deceptive. The in-fighting between circular and flat-earth communities, especially from flat-earth devotees firing negative memes and comments at those asking the simplest questions have forgotten they were once globe Earth believers.  

Google Calling Houston... We Have A problem!

Mark Harrison... Dave Weiss will give you 9 bitcoin if you can prove the Earth is round. No one has succeeded as yet — Why Not? But wait a minute, scientists say you're nothing more the an evolved monkey, that's right a monkey... eee, aww aww aww

Since 2015, Google has been desperately censoring, shadow banning anything related to the increasing interest of Flat Earth. Google uses stealth algorithms to hide real flat earth links, replacing them directly to the FAKE "Flat Earth Society", a government based controlled disinformation website. The above screenshot (Aug 2023) shows the amount of views outside Google's reach of control — 4.4 billion and counting. 18 emergency landings comparing globe versus flat route projections. What is the best debunking curvature video camera? Nikon Coolpix P1000.
Greg Olkinson, has been a senior developer at Google for seven years. He is in charge of strategy and operations at Google Earth, leading a team of 10 engineers — this is what he had to say, "As a lead Google developer for over seven years it is my responsibility to finally address our terrestrial landscape"
"After years of diligent study and intent work I have conducted there is no way the world can be spherical. Given how our data at Google has never matched up to NASA's data, and given how modern technology simply cannot measure the magnitude of such a planet, we can never really be guaranteed the earth is spherical. The truth is, this idea is so ingrained in our culture that no one questions it. Well, I'm questioning it." direct link

Popular Science 1931, ten miles high "Through portholes, the observers saw the earth through copper-colored, then bluish haze. It seemed a flat disc with upturned edge." Thirty years later in 1961, one year before operation Fishbowel, (NASA document) "In addition to the above requirements, this stimulation assumes a vehicle with six degrees of freedom and aerodynamic symmetry in roll and the missile in space is computed relative to a flat non-rotating earth." Daniel Pratt - planes landing on a 1000 mph spinning ball
Below, fast forwarding to today's aerodynamic subject matter, page one of a flight dynamics summary introduction for flight school aero-students. The flat Earth, non-rotating Earth, is used as 'assumptions'. Now why, if the Earth is round, a globe constantly spinning through space, still requires the need of using the continuing flat non-rotating Earth equation that NASA had used in 1961? Is it because the Earth is actually stationary and level without ever mentioning the Earth is non-rotating past assumptions?  

Encyclopedia Britannica Americana Vol 2 1960 (Antarctica section) PP 11-15
"Four United States planes flew from New Zealand to McMurdo Sound on Dec. 20, 1956, and made exploratory flights over unknown parts of the continent until Jan.18, 1956, when they returned to New Zealand. These flights proved the inland areas to be featureless in character, with a dome 13.000 feet high at about 80 degrees South, longitude 90 degrees East."
The above doesn't prove a dome (firmament) over the Earth. In saying that, no one can freely travel on their own accord 80° degree south either. The off-limits black-ban to freely travel anywhere past 60° degree south has been in effect since 1959. The 1959 accord has not been changed. Only the upper peninsula tip and surrounding islands, is open to tourism (Shetlands).
This is not about penguin colonies, it's not about mineral resources, it's not about exploration. The Antarctica treaty, is about containing all the information so it doesn't get out. If there was nothing to hide, the entire region past the 60th parallel would be freely open for all wanting to go there. You get more sense from an 8 year old.

Only jet cockpit windows are flat. Passengers looking at Earth curvature are actually seeing curvature through curved windows.

The majority of images taken of supposed curvature inside jets by passengers are taken with wide angle view — lenses under 50mm.

This is what you're paying for up at 30k feet — compressed air while inside aluminum tubes. Airline fuel surcharge, is more than half of the flight expense. In other words, the airline industry is sucking in free atmosphere ripping you off.  

Calculating the volume weight load fuel capacity in the wings of an A380 doesn't add up. Each wing holding 130 tons of added weight would bend and break clean off. It's officially stated, it takes 45 minutes to fill the A380's wings of fuel, which is 7,189 liters per minute. This is an impossibility with volume load speed versus pressure load into wing tanks. We are told jets are a part of global boiling. All that jet vapor seen in the sky, known as contrails, is nothing more than compressed air being released into non-pressured air during cruising speed — the atmosphere. Airline ticket fares charge approximately 50% of each fare for fuel costs, most of that being free atmosphere.

At 35,000 feet, image taken from the cockpit jump seat with a standard 50mm camera lens. The view is level — zero curvature.

No matter what you've been told or searched online, curvature is 8 inches per mile square — one pilot's testimony

What's the very first programmed indoctrination everyone receives at five years of age without questioning it? The spinning round globe on the teachers desk during the first week of school. We were all infatuated past the point of any disbelief. Above, not the best quality image to present something, but good enough. A non-fisheye lens roll film snap taken in the mid-1980s onboard a Boeing 707 —  inside the cockpit flying directly toward the Himalaya. The viewing of peaks in Nepal, Sikkim, Bhutan and India were visible. As you can see, there should be approximately 70+ kilometers of earth curvature from east to west, north to south — which there is none. What does that tell you? And the earth is also spinning @1000 MPH, and orbiting around the sun @66,000 MPH (107,000 KPH) — Say what? Everything we have been educated on about the Heliocentric model is a lie. Antarctica holds all the secrets. The obvious reason why global population have been banned to freely go there, since 1959. All of a sudden, the great diversion kicked in — the moon, reaching the moon going to the moon. Since the early 1960s we have been conditionally brainwashed into deep space deception. Star Trek was part of it, Space Oddessy, Close Encounters, ET included. I would assume the earth, is much larger in its landmass expanse beyond 60° south from north. All those trillions of dollars is going somewhere. Do your own research down in rabbit holes — Eric Dubay 200 proofs : Dave Weiss DITRH 
Warning — Avoid all links to 'The Flat Earth Society'. The flat earth society website, is a government disinformation website i.e. "we have no time looking at the flat earth society" Barack Obama wink wink.

Any debate or added research on curvature beyond the horizon should be self-experimented. In general most will find questionable data on curve and refraction discrepancies. The images above were taken at the same spot using different lenses (right image is heavily cropped). Both images show a vehicle and four people appearing to be above the horizon. There is no curvature, mirage or refraction here, even though people still cling on to what they've been indoctrinated with.

We are told ships begin disappearing, dropping below the horizon beyond 5 KM from coastlines, by curvature. The above image capture has a measured visible distance of 22.5 KM's, 14 miles (Nikkor 800 5.6 DX format, teleconverter) The mirage effect, duct, superior mirage, looming, thermal inversion, and refraction are pointed key words combined to sea surface temperatures. Considering ships are simply disappearing out of sight, because of limited vision our eyesight struggles to magnify through the atmosphere at long distances. The above image wasn't even taken with a P1000. If it was, the P1000 would easily zoom well past this ship's location revealing much more detail about zero curvature. Next time when at shorelines, take a good look at sea level.  Everything about ocean sea levels is level — not curvature.

Even using small fixed prime lenses are able to reveal objects at the converging lines of the horizon and atmosphere — try it.

Personally researching curvature yourself begins by disregarding lab coat scientists, google searches and with smartphone junk switched off. It's simple basics of what your own eyes and photo gear can see and capture. To be frank, curvature existence has little to no evidence when up @35K feet or down at the beach. This becomes more apparent when using telescopes, binoculars, and super zoom cameras, like the Nikon P1000 point and shoot reaching out to 3000mm.     

Questioning the heliocentric model, invisible gravity and Earth's curvature is forbidden. We have all been educated since the first day at school curvature exists, the Earth is round and does not require further investigation. The indoctrination level, is so impregnated, that anyone debating Earth curvature is ridiculed beyond imagination. People doing their own research discovering curvature discrepancies are immediately dismissed and trashed. Why is that? The above images are during a Lunar eclipse showing distinctive shadow curvature moving across the Moon's surface.
The below top three images showing shadow curvature through different Lunar phases. Sun and Earth shadow curvature passing across the Moon should remain constant — The above Lunar eclipse image captures are proof of this.

Heliocentric pseudoscience gatekeepers will certainly load your mind why there's no shadow curvature, as shown above. Most will agree without questioning or debating on whatever is told, and go straight back to sleep. Ancient myths have abound through time. The big bang theory we came from monkeys, is still believed. We have been told Invisible gravity exists but not proven. Refraction also exists and required on a heliocentric system. Earth curvature is real and cannot be proven unless in deep space — Really? I'm still waiting for 24/7 live stream video feed showing Earth's shape, form and movement proving outright Earth's spin and curvature. Why has this never happened? Why do we only get continuous CGI (computer generated imagery)? Everything on the heliocentric model has been pushed beyond limits for good reason. The deception must be kept that we live on a fluid rotating ball, spinning through space around the sun, at super mach speeds. Sitting down at any lakeside early in the morning with mountainous views gives the opposite effect. Strolling along coastal shorelines peering at horizon levels show the same results  — no horizontal curvature. Removing the entire heliocentric model questions arise what is then causing shadow curvature across the Moon. Is it another object, some calling the black sun having the same dimensions. Could the sun, moon, stars be instead a mirrored trajectory? Are we possibly only looking at discs appearing as they look round, that's why only one side is ever seen? Aka dark side of the Moon still with non-CGI evidence from NASA's apparent deep space junk. What is now known, stars are not the mega-billion mileage distant we've been told. Stars are much closer, which questions, if the sun and moon are also the same diameter sizes. You have to ask yourself, why can a simple Nikon P1000 point & shoot camera easily capture super closeup video footage of 'so called' distant stars? With deceptive lies and programming, since the 1950s, no wonder generations of people are fast asleep.          

We've literally seen thousands upon thousands of wundarbar image snaps taken at ocean seashores and mountainous locations using the same common theme — horizon sunset. I've also been in that creative atmosphere scouring around for the best location to get better sunset snaps than the day before. Nothing is questioned, it's all about the sunset, how good it looks, and how many likes it receives. That was years ago, before leaving social media platforms. I don't miss them one bit. Waking up moving out of "chasing likes", and to "be liked", is difficult when you're inside those addictive social media circles. You don't need to think, just post an image, get liked, chat some mush, and repeat the same crap the next day. It's the same process when looking at images. The more radiant, the more HDR, the more color effect blinds whatever was the original image. This is where it gets interesting. The image above, an original Raw Nef has no depth giving viewers little to no interest. But wait, there's something in this image debunking all those sunset snaps we've become accustomed to. There is no horizon in this image. Actually, the horizon level is below this 30+ story high-rise. At 2° elevation with only minutes remaining the sun should of been dropping below the horizon, and it's not. So what's happening here? The sun is simply moving further away from this particular location while completely fading away at the same time. It's not rocket science. Ocean beach sunset snaps all give the perspective view, tricking the brain, as if the sun is setting below horizon levels. It's called chasing the imaginary curve that doesn't exist.  

Through travel journeys, most of us end up at coastlines scattered across continents. A number of coastlines I've been to are mentioned in the above image for good reason. What's common and ignored are ocean horizons. Most would look at the boat in the image without looking any further beyond the boat. What's interesting with the coastlines and locations above, not one of them had signs of horizon curvature — Not a single location. They were all level, and still level well beyond the perspective viewing with the naked eye using long range lenses and  binoculars. Next time when visiting coastlines, take a pair of binoculars and look for yourself.    

Lunar Shots - RAW Format.

You don't require the latest photo gear capturing lunar shots. What is required are reasonable quality lenses from 500mm up. For video, the Nikon P1000 Coolpix will capture stars in their real shape and form — the opposite of NASA fake space images seen online.

There's no debate, the moon is the most photographed object in the sky. The Moon is taken for granted as it looks in its shape and form with little need of questioning any deeper than necessary how it looks when photographed. In general, most ignore observing abnormal Lunar behavior without noticing any Lunar occurrences within their image captures. Instead, it's all about focusing on the artistic side of what can be captured and accepted within the photographic world, as great Moon shots.

A quick screen grab from a random RAW NEF 15MP file cropped and enlarged — Nikkor 800 5.6 ED AIS manual focus prime.

Why capture still images in RAW? Any image taken in RAW will hold all available information of each image, including the EXIF Metadata of each image when it was exactly taken down to the second — EXIF data is valuable for proving you own and took the image.

Even when 95% opaque, the Moon shows full visibility, easily captured with most semi-pro cameras using quality lenses.

Shooting in RAW gives the maximum advantage rendering images in post-processing. RAW also holds important EXIF data when images were taken, including which format was used. Non-fancy lunar captures are more than simple enough to capture. F8-F11  @1/80 to 1/125 Sec are the usual settings when the Moon is clearly visible. Almost any DSLR 12MP up with reasonable long reach lenses mounted to stable tripods will do the job. The above Lunar stills were taken with a D780 & 800 5.6 AIS prime lens. The D800 is my favorite go to body for Lunar snaps. Even now 14 years old, the D800 doesn't fail capturing one shot at a time.     

Above, Oct. 2023 non-stacked image — 1986 Nikon Nikkor 800 5.6 ED AIS prime lens — Made in Japan. Just like the majority of global population have difficulty believing super rapid one second clockwise anti-clockwise 90° lunar rotations exist, most also think anything old outdated from the past, is bygone junk. It's actually the opposite. Bad made junk began flooding the market by China. It didn't take long for greedy western world companies and private businesses to increase their profit margins, by moving their manufacturing departments to China. 90% of junky made products are made in China, and people can't wait to purchase all that junk. Western governments also love all that imported junk from China. They make millions yearly in tax profit. Japanese made products, made in Japan, since the 1960s, outranks anything made in China. Good quality made designed products work and keep on working for decades — not months!

Capturing rapid 90° rotations doesn't require the latest lenses and camera bodies. What is required, is reach. As much reach as possible with limited distortion. My own rapid 90° rotation captures certainly won't win photo awards, but they have enough focus quality showing the before and after occurrences. DSLR DX cameras are good to go when using reasonable long range FX lenses, in 1.3 crop mode. This gives an equivalent of 800mm. Forget about quality and sharpness here. It's all about capturing shots of the Moon when the Moon just becomes visible or during late fading.

Example FOV snaps in DX & FX formats. Below, 6MP image taken with a D3S in DX format wide open @5.6.

Below, FX and DX camera format sizes with full frame (FX) lenses @800 & 1200 cropped formats.

What Is Relative - What Is Pseudo-Science?

"There are two great luminaries: their circumference is like the circumference of the heaven, and the size of the circumference of both is alike" The Book of Enoch Ethiopian translation Chapter LXXVII : Qumran fragments Enoch 350 BC

What have I personally observed monitoring the sun and moon during low angle? In general, at most locations, both sun and moon fade away well before reaching horizon levels. This occurrence happens during first and last visibility. This suggests both sun and moon begin to appear only within a certain distance at each location. Shoreline perspective value is compromised by distance until powerful lenses show the same results of the sun and moon fading away — not disappearing behind curvature. Getting out doing your own surveys, using camera gear, binoculars and telescope will confirm the above, is correct. Just understanding what Airplane and Sea level means, is a good start.
1961 NASA document, "In addition to the above requirements, this stimulation assumes a vehicle with six degrees of freedom and aerodynamic symmetry in roll and the missile in space is computed relative to a flat non-rotating earth."  When NASA changes and updates sun to earth distances, they also require to change the entire heliocentric model mileage — What does that tell you?      

The sun, like the moon, shows similar patterns when first showing visibility, or when fading, as though the sun is rising or dropping below horizons. The question is, is it dropping, or simply moving further away beyond our perspective view point? Atmospheric density plays a roll in this. We take sunrise and sunsets as common theory of the sun's orbital path on a heliocentric model. There's certainly enough video evidence showing the sun is not actually dropping below horizons, only moving further away above horizon levels until becoming opaque.

Since my first DSLR, I've captured images in RAW format no matter the subject matter. This is automatic procedure amongst seasoned photographers. Also traveling overland through continents with tripods becomes valuable when taking stills of low light light subjects. Keeping the same image format during quick shoots, is recommended (horizontal or vertical). The above RAW Nef files from start to finish was under 3 minutes. There's no time or the need rotating cameras during first visibility or fading of Lunar and Sun — keep it simple.         

Typical atmospheric density causing lunar fading A normal occurrence, even before the moon becomes visible, or during fading before reaching horizon level. The moon above, began fading quickly within 60 seconds from this particular location. All three images weren't visible through the lens, and difficult seen with the naked eye and binoculars. It's around this time when rapid 90° anti-clockwise clockwise rotations have occurred. Below right, this particular location was across landmass @3° West — ISO 6400 1/10th Sec.

Depending the location, on any continental landmass, rapid 90° rotations may occur beyond and past zero visibility of capturing them. On most occasions with approximately 15-20 minutes above the horizon line, the moon completely fades into darkness. The Moon doesn't  disappear behind physical landmass curvature. The Moon was only moving further beyond visibility from these particular locations.
Talk about naive — I didn't just wake up, I got angry, pissed off, being lied to for decades with fake space. It's not until you personally do your own research, finding solid data, of how great the deception really is. What made me wake up? Capturing rapid 90° rotations on numerous occasions, including other data. This completely questions Moon landings, and unravels the heliocentric Earth model we have all been programmed to believe. That data is not found on Google search! You will also get angry, but breathing fresh air at the same time knowing truth. The first thing noticed, is everything you see around you — is level. Oceans are level, horizons are level, lakes are level. When sitting beside lakes, at dawn and dusk, the water is smooth with no ripples. This alone, debunks the 1000 MPH, 66,00 MPH, 1/2 million MPH of Earth spinning, rotating through space. Gravity, a non-existent unprovable invisible pseudo-science hogwash.

Above, recent snaps of the moon during fading at minus —1° W —3° W elevation. Viewing the Moon at first visibility and during fading times at locations has little to do with Earth curvature. It's the perspective viewing of the Moon & Sun at any given location.     

Top left, first glimpse of lunar visibility at low elevation level captured in RAW. Using video at these low levels is disappointing!

Half of the Earth isn't upside down. The massive amount of 50% of the Earth's liquid ocean mass with its total volume weight, upside down without flinging-off from a moving rotating round mass, requires minimal self-critical thinking skills, gravity doesn't exist. NASA have been unable to provide such simple images of Earth upside down, because they can't. NASA has never been beyond low Earth orbit — that's why. Meanwhile, NASA's advancement using undetectable CGI blue green screen live-time in space, or any future Lunar landings, is the ultimate goal and purpose fooling global population. NASA lied to the world in 1969. The technology NASA uses now totally hides their deceit, once again, the world will become subdued, almost hypnotized believing in fake space programs.    

In the 2020s trust nothing — question everything. The internet gatekeepers have been flat out busy purging, removing and deleting historical data and evidence since 2001. The internet is now over-loaded with massive amounts of crafted pseudoscience, specifically targeted at younger generations. It's all about programming, controlling deceptive agendas keeping populations totally brainwashed from knowing truth.

At 93 million miles distance there should be minimal angle from sun rays, just like the top left. Instead we see in plain sight narrow to wide angle views of sun rays beaming down from above. What I personally assume, the sun is much closer than what we've been told. 

Angular perspective of the sun in regards to the mileage distance that we've been told doesn't add up. 

We have been brainwashed the sun is 93 million miles away. The majority of population will not question NASA's mileage data. One only has to observe crepuscular ray angle reflections debunking this distance. If the sun is 93 million miles away, it would not produce angular rays, like above. Instead, it would show straight directional light. What does this tell you? The sun is more local than what we are being told.

Everything is in plain sight for anyone researching beyond and past what they've been educated and indoctrinated with since their first day in school. Pursuing real facts and data isn't found in Google searches for obvious reasons. Google is part of the global controlled deception. NASA have been the fake space gatekeepers since they were created. NASA's top Nazi scientist, Wernher von Braun, exposes his vision, engraved on his grave headstone — Psalms 19:1 'The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmaments showeth His handywork'

Above and below, typical fading of sun and moon well above horizon level. When sun and moon visibility occurs at horizon level, the perspective view from that location assumes the sun and moon are dropping below 'earth curvature'. No, what's actually happening, is both sun and moon are moving further away from that particular location, as though they appear to be dropping, but they're not.       

From any location we observe the sun as though the sun is dropping below the horizon. Is the sun actually dropping below what we have been brainwashed to believe — Earth curvature? The above image example, shows an opaque sun above the horizon fading away, caused by distance and atmospheric density. The sun is simply moving beyond the visual perspective view at this location. The Moon when first appearing and fading gives similar results. Best advice — spend time capturing images when the sun begins to bottom fade to verify for yourself. A video revealing this occurrence in real time — ignore YouTube's Wikipedia 3 letter agency fact checking nonsense.

This example lunar snap according to Moon-rise and setting times, should have already dropped below the horizon. The RAW file is in its original DX 3200x4800 vertical format dimensions. It was captured with pushed ISO at 0° degree altitude after total fading. The Moon clearly shows no horizon below its position. So what's happening here? The Moon is simply moving further away beyond that particular location's perspective viewpoint. Let's not forget, the majority of Lunar photography through continents, is at first visibility, not during fading times, like above. Best advice — Observe, if in fact the Moon when @0° West actually drops below the horizon or just fades away above landmass. The above image was taken during a Moon phase height of 88° 2° N. The sun at Western positions during fading does exactly the same. The sun is simply moving beyond perspective view, as if the sun is disappearing below horizons. DSLR FX in DX mode & TC @1700mm.

It's important, especially on this page showing as much data as possible of when certain Lunar images were captured. The above and below screenshots give clarity of when the above Lunar shot was exactly taken. Altitude time is NaN° (below the horizon).   

RAW NEF timestamp data of original image files will always show <exif:DateTimeOriginal> just like above. 

According to brainwashing Science, the Earth is spinning @1000 MPH at the equator. OK, flying from northern and southern locations of Earth landing at equatorial airports in Sri Lanka, Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, Somalia, Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda, Equatorial Guinea, CAR, Nigeria, Gabon, Cameroon, French Guiana, Guyana, Suriname, Colombia, Ecuador, and Venezuela, would require jets to land while the Earth is spinning sideways @1000 MPH — Say what?
At the same time, the spinning globe is apparently orbiting around the sun @66 mach speed, and chasing the sun 100X times faster. And you don't even feel it — not a single vibration. But if I drive my V8 @100mph along a straight stretch of smooth highway, with a dinner plate filled with water, and increase or slow down the car's speed, or take slight curves — You know what's going to happen. This hyper-sonic sled track is doing 6,599 MPH (8.6mach). Now do you really believe the Earth's constant 1000 MPH spin + 66,000 MPH (Mach 88) around the sun + within an orbiting galaxy @480,000 MPH rotating at four different angles through space @ 2.2 million MPH — Really? And to rub salt into all the fakeness — not one star crosses paths of other stars. Those believing this fake space mumbo jumbo, whatever you've been smoking, snorting, or indoctrinated with has done it's job . 

Anything coming red hot out of barrels, is going straight hitting its target. Only windage adjustments are sometimes necessary.

Do You Trust Maps & Mileage Data? - Nothing Is What It Is!

The remaining Earth's landmass, is over 14 times the size of NASA's 2012 Marble Earth — And will not fit on this NASA model.

The Gleason's 1892 map states 'scientifically and practically correct'. This is one of limited maps showing an outer perimeter landmass which appears to be an ice wall. What is beyond that ice wall is unknown. Since 1958, amalgamated military defense forces have been deployed to keep global populations from entering freely into this region. Wait, it's to protect penguin colonies and keeping the ice shelf pristine — right? If you believe that garbage, you've been successfully indoctrinated from decades of deception.      

Gatekeeping fake space mileage data has successively completed it's objective. As a street photographer, it's difficult to capture anything large, like distant mountains, roaming wildlife in sharp focus beyond 20 miles. What does that tell you?  

We are also told Antarctica is the 5th largest continent. Google maps/Google Earth will not give you Antarctica measurements. When sitting at any lakeside, they are contained by higher landmass keeping water in, and remain level. This is the same at ocean coastlines, the sea is level. This would assume something is containing the Earth's sea water in level position. This points to the Antarctica landmass being higher, and not at the bottom of the planet, rather at 60° degrees south in all directions from center North. The question also arises of Antarctica's so called 13,000 mile circumference. Why did James Cook spend 3 years, and had sailed 68,000 miles navigating this continent? Do the math. Earth's circumference at the Equator is apparently 24.900 miles.

Powerful gatekeepers have been hiding true landmass sizes using deceptive maps for centuries. In other words, no maps can be trusted. The majority of original maps through the last 2000 years have either been destroyed, hidden, or altered. The above and below maps show mileage distances across landmass that doesn't make any sense. Helium balloon low orbit GPS at its best.

Greenland's physical landmass from west to east has a mileage distance of 1087 kilometers. This means Greenland's widest physical size, is six times smaller than Africa's widest width. The 11,063 kilometer distance from Amsterdam to Naukan (Bering Strait) compared to Africa's physical landmass size and mileage distance should be triple the mileage. What this tells you, the earth's landmass sizes and distances are not what we've been told — Nothing is what it is.    

2024 google map continental landmass mileage data — scratch your head a few times figuring this out. 

There are too many discrepancies. Earth's landmass, is ether much larger in total size, with other landmass that has purposely remained invisibly hidden. Or the landmass we see on all maps have been doctored, changed and altered through the centuries, by powerful gatekeepers i.e. ancient bloodlines, royalty bloodlines, and controlling hierarchy establishments over populations. The increase of constant pseudo-science programming has rewarded most people with brain fog disabilities unable to self-critical think for themselves.
Best advice — deprogram yourself from years of indoctrinated mind control from the usual suspects, who regurgitate the same agenda process through numerous consolidated enterprises and agencies i.e. Google, Google affiliates, Bing, Bing affiliates, NASA, NASA affiliates, Educational institutes, Hollywood, Music industry, Three letter agencies, Big pharma, Governmental agencies, Globalists, Scientific institutes, Banking industry, Fashion, Big Tech, Sport, Television, Main stream media, including Social media platforms. It's all about controlling populations within circles of circles, maintaining division and divide within those circles. This is the easiest method to control population mass without populations even waking up. Just look around you, look at yourself. Your mind has probably been reprogrammed and hijacked through years of deceptive programming without even knowing it. For many, this is difficult to swallow, but as the subtitle of this page says 'Ignore reading anything below, if you have ego or self-pride issues'

1892 Gleason's map, used as the UN logo. It can also be used tracking emergency flight landings exposing the heliocentric model. Some have stated the Gleason's map was designed from a globe model design. Wrong, the Gleason's map had to use a patent from globe coordinates. This was the only legal way to have the Gleason map patented, by decree during that time period.

An original copy of the 'New Correct Map Of The Flat Surface, Stationary Earth', by John G. Abizaid, 1920. The map design shows a North center position with East West circling around center North. South surrounds the entire outer perimeter. This map is archived in the Library of Congress Geography and Map Division, Washington DC, USA # 2013585077

1943 CBS American school air map. Very similar to the 1892 Glesson's map showing additional flight path routes. One has to question why they would still use the Gleason's design, 50 years later, acknowledging the Gleason's map was designed as a North center map. As for a Biblical perspective, in regards to a firmament, if it really exists, the 1958 Britannica states the following "Four US planes flew to McMurdo sound in 1955 making exploratory flights over unknown parts of the continent. These flights proved the inland mass to be featureless in character, with a dome 13,000 feet high at latitude 80°S, longitude 90°E." This would then equate, if using the height, altitude, longitude mentioned, would give a maximum vertical height of man-made 'space' vehicles of reaching 73 miles, at the center position of that radius. These earlier designed maps positioning north center makes more sense than the maps we are accustomed to today.

The only things moving in the above image are cloud reflections and a vehicle. The straight level flat edge of water with zero ripples on the water's surface debunks the four directional movements of Earth, while constantly doing speeds of 1000 MPH + 66,000 MPH + 1/2 million MPH through space — It's called Pseudoscience. We have been brainwashed, de-educated believing this crap all our lives. The 100 mile long Suez Canal connecting two different oceans, is not only level, but also reveals, in plain sight the perfect levelness of both oceans. Image RH

It doesn't matter the country or continent, or landmass height, all moving fluid will run it's course until finding level.

99.9% of low Earth orbit images taken with video and cameras use wide angle optics and lenses to capture as much subject matter in the image as possible. Low Earth orbit image captures of anything taken from spacecraft will show semi to extreme curvature just like above. Full frame camera wide angle lenses start at 45mm down to 10.5mm. Gopro cameras in high altitudes are used at wide angle. It's rare, almost non-existent low earth orbit image captures have been taken with 50mm lenses, which would show zero curvature.     

Above, non-wide angle lens long shot taken @30° with a narrow perspective view.

Typical wide angle perspective view when using camera lenses @15mm. Curvature angle is clearly visible in this non-stacked high res DSLR image. Only a few high res images are on this website due to image theft! This is one of them.

Midnight snap of Orbs captured in the Sahara using a point and shoot. The propaganda deception of "intelligent aliens" secretly hovering around the planet, is alive and well Pentagon 2023. Anyone with half a brain will acknowledge "intelligent aliens" would of exposed themselves to mankind centuries ago taking over the human race eradicating global population — This has never happened. It's more logical to assume certain hierarchy within designated bloodlines control the fate of mankind, by using whatever advanced technology required to subdue, pacify, and indoctrinate global populations into submission. With no doubt, the next major upcoming event to be pushed through MSM, is the "Alien UFO" threat — A Norad, Darpa, NASA, Pentagon wet dream conspiracy they want you to believe.
First we had the big freeze ice age returning in the 1970s, then all of a sudden — global warming kicked in, then — climate change, because the gatekeepers required to use both sides of weather temps. Now it's global boiling propaganda. By 2029, the rhetoric will change to global melting. More on this in the Global Live page. Below, a recent snap in subzero temps — No global boiling here. 

Energy  Frequency - Polaris+ -Rupes Nigra (blackrock)

Original SLR 35mm roll film images I had personally taken in Tibet during the mid-1980s.

Hitler's expeditions to Antarctica and Tibet during the 1930s weren't for land grab expansion purposes or for paradise hideaways. It was for gathering certain data, ancient knowledge, unaltered mapping locations for æther electromagnetic energy, as it was previously used through the centuries, before it was all shut down, dismantled, hidden and camouflaged, by powerful gatekeepers. The extracting and using of electromagnetic energy from the æther (ionosphere) was established, by using frequency waves through high and low sound vibration. There is some evidence of this before the last reset, of older constructed buildings adorned in perfect architecture, including what we know today as churches, originally cathodes, renamed cathedrals, and mosques that were initially large generators gathering current.
Do you really think all the ancient domed golden copper roofs, large pillars, cupola structures, all with octagonal designs through Europe, north America, Middle East and Asia were mosques, temples and churches? If so, you're really fast asleep. They were combined designed resonators, generators using sound vibration.
Large octagonal designed structures before the 20th century were probably part of free power energy sources — ethereal, æther, electromagnet collection of Ions from the sky. Everything of that era using free energy was dismantled and covered up. Crosses and crescents were once seen together on large structures, now separated on purpose by design. Just looking at the metal, Mercury symbol, a combined crescent and cross tells you Mercury was a main substance, by using its abilities for alternating current flow, including electromagnetic frequency signals. This isn't a bash at religious values. It's about what happened, why the coverup separating these symbols? Cross and crescent symbolism were entwined together. The deception is that great, most won't believe it.
Grandeur mansions also had similar designed pattern layouts. They used various shapes and sizes of multiple golden and copper domes, golden antennas, round orbs, pointed steeples, multi-symmetric cavity patterns, multi-column conductive pillars, octagonal layouts and large solid arches (magnets) for gathering, collecting æther energy — all by using water and sound wave tone and frequency vibration.  But, wait, in the 19th century people were still using horse and cart — something happened. All has been hidden, although many original structures are still in plain sight. There is also evidence of older buildings half buried in the ground. Looking at what's available in common research, there's two obvious connections, a global mud flood had occurred, and the 1859 Carrington event. It's also worthy noting, the cross and half moon crescent were used together in uniform before powerful gatekeepers split them into two religious circles. Mercury was an important component for gathering Æther energy — which uses both symbol patterns, the cross and crescent moon. The planet Mercury, everything about the planet Mercury, we've been told, is nothing more than deceptive jigsaw heliocentric pseudo-science programming.
It only takes one or two generations to switch, hide, alter and cover up whatever past technology was used. In other words, multiple resets have occurred. — Historical town halls. We are in the beginning of another reset right now — post-human to trans-human.

Ursa Major through the four seasons circling Polaris. This has been used as symbolic symbolism as positive energy, and has been used symbolically through time in Tibetan, Jain, Jewish Hopi, Maltese, Ceylonese, Chinese, Japanese, Islamic Balinese, Celt, Aztec, Hindu, Christian and Lapland cultures and traditions. There's been endless amounts of misinformed narratives this symbolism was first designed in 1933, by the 3rd Reich. It's more than likely of no coincidence to keep this symbolism for what it actually reveals under the rug for obvious reasons. The Georgia Guidestones, before it's rapid demolition (1980-2022), had a small pinhole through one of the slabs when first erected, directly pointed at Polaris. For over 41 years Polaris was observed through that same pinhole. Earth, as we are told, moves approximately 1° every 76 years. This would mean Polaris should have moved well beyond this pinhole viewing — over half a degree (41 years), but was still visible in 2022. What does that tell you? We must also add to the Heliocentric model, earth's axis movement and tilt, 1000 MPH spin, and 66,000 MPH orbiting around the sun. All that movement and mach speed, but Polaris was still visibly observed through that tiny little pinhole. Does it make more sense the earth is stationary, or flying through space without even feeling it? The Georgia Guidestones were deliberately destroyed on purpose for either what was written on them, or for what they wanted to remain hidden. 

Removing the heliocentric model of distances and diameters. Is there something else concealed creating Lunar phases and eclipses? The black Sun? Who knows? Nothing is coincidental. Since the origin of Freemasonry, masonic establishments are known for their secrecy. What isn't hidden in plain view, is masonic symbolism that has remained constant within those established orders   — As above so below.

An iPhone clip up @35k briefly showing a full moon tracking S.E. to S.W. — notice the horizon to the moon position. Also another interesting clip showing the sun positioned well in front of the horizon

What is that glowing below? Just one from millions of luminaries seen across the night sky. Is it round? No one knows that answer. One things for sure, it's the opposite of NASA's deep space fakes.

Ancient Days  - Hidden History

They're seen everywhere, ancient tree stumps is the logical conclusion of what they appear to be. Not many go down this rabbit hole, because it opens up cans of wombs of science denial. A few locations worth visiting having the same designs are Venezuela, Peru, Madagascar, eastern Sahara, south Africa and USA. 

Historical records and original history data was lost, misplaced, destroyed, meddled with, hidden, or has been deliberately changed on purpose through time. All that's remaining, is what is found on remnants of solid granite, or from pillaged artifacts displayed in museums. Everything on ancient history, is a repeat, follow and copy of what had already been changed and modified. Second, third, fourth hand reprint publications were already corrupted by the 10th century. What is left, is like our modern era jigsaw puzzle of the last century. This massive amount of hidden data and global exploitation secrecy will never see the light of day, and that's only within the last century. Gatekeepers in modern time are no different from their ancient gatekeeping counterparts. Trying to find original historical data penned between the 2nd to 9th century, is an almost impossible task. No doubt, whatever original historical records that have survived are stored under lock and key with no access.

What we've been told and educated about history today has far to many gaps questioning history itself. Changes, alterations and coverups were already administered centuries ago. Powerful gatekeepers have controlled every aspect of this world, and still continues at full speed. History has too many discrepancies through the centuries. Even Egyptian timelines don't add up. Let's not forget, the Aleppo Codex was only written in 800 AD. Where did they get all that data to write that new data? Although in saying that, ancient chronology that holds an account of people, tribes, kings, timelines, regions and locations, is what has been recorded in Biblical records.

There's little to nothing of ancient history records that have either been altered, doctored, changed or modified through different timelines. Controlling populations by using different forms of indoctrinated fear has never changed. In other words, all humans are disposable by whoever has reign over them. Today, various bloodlines and globalist hierarchy have the entire world at their feet.         

Questioning ancient history today has become more focused on whether we have been indoctrinated with fake fictional story telling. What is known, Smithsonian gatekeepers have been two steps ahead keeping what requires to be hidden — hidden, then self-collaborate together before releasing anything to the masses. Honestly, I don't believe anything of what we were taught in the education system!     

Ancient Hindu heritage built across south east to central Asia (Indonesia - Afghanistan).

Partial solid rock pillar columns is all that remains standing at this particular location — Original designers? I don't know, I didn't ask.     

Like anywhere in the world, ancient sites are managed by one globalist controlled entity — UNESCO. 

Rock facade architecture inherited by the Inca. Original history origin has been somewhat jaded and shredded through time. 

Image stills showing the same basic design construction in South America and Africa.

Above, original cutout slot. New updated methods and explanations of Inca stone walls still continue in the 2020s. That's how much they require to keep the wheels spinning coming in from all directions adding more confusion to what was already confusing.

Remote isolated 4 BC rock cliff face quarry — Mid-East. Finding such structures, like above, requires considerable time off the beaten track. Notice the clean cut outs of rock face. How was this accomplished? Hand chisels and hammers? 

Underground, above ground, archeological sites through South America, Asia, Middle East and Africa visited by the website owner. 

Above, one of 24 wheels, 12 pair in total erected on the Sun temple chariot, Konark. Not long ago, the wheels at Konark temple were believed to be for decoration only. Each wheel has a 9 foot, 9 inch diameter. Only 2 wheels have been discovered showing precise time. Calculating time is by shade movement cast across miniature beads on the inner rim of the wheel, as the sun moves East to West. Hidden secrets not as yet discovered on other wheels may also reveal lunar timelines, astro related movements, including north southern positions.

Questions arise of who were the grand designers, the sculptors of the Sun temple. The significance of numerous forms of unique dragon designs on the temple point directly to Chinese influence. What's more interesting, is the miniature giraffe, in the above image. There are no history records of giraffes roaming in India during this time period. It wasn't until 1875, British colonialists brought single species of giraffe to India. The logical conclusions, foreign sculptors were brought in under contract or slavery completing the temple. Or the temple's first construction was by foreign entities, and decommissioned, allowing second and third rebuilds through different timelines. This places question to who were the original architects designing the sun dial, and if the sun temple is much older than what is assumed.   

Below, tourists flocking at sunset on various temples and monasteries, Bagan, a late comer falling under the UNESCO umbrella.

Getting through continents spending time observing architectural designs from past civilizations will open your eyes understanding what we have been told about history, has many gaps. Wide gaps that don't make any sense. Has our history been covered up on purpose for reasons unknown? One things for sure when digging down rabbit holes — ocean and landmass mapping is incorrect.    

We no longer build noble architectural structures. Instead, modern design is more superficial unable to withstand the test of time. It's almost guaranteed these ancient sites will still be standing another 500 years, while 21st century complexes disappear and forgotten.  

Some of the top Middle East archaeological sites are located in Syria, Jordan, Iraq, Israel, Egypt, Saudi and Iran. 

North African pyramids from different timeline dynasties —  north Sudan, Egypt (AFS 14-24mm 2.8G)

No Go Zone - Established By Gatekeepers 1959

In 1959, a total carpet ban was enforced, excluding global population to travel beyond the 60° south parallel. GPS sat navigation has worked effortlessly, producing coordinates around the planet for decades, but not Antarctica. The Global Positioning System (GPS), originally Navstar GPS, is a satellite-based radio system owned and operated by the US government. Hydrogen assisted balloon satellites have been launched in Antarctica since the 1960s. Still today, it's impossible to receive live mapping and sat GPS positioning from any website platform beyond the 60° south parallel. Using Google Maps circulating a country's landmass size is relatively simple — try Antarctica and see what happens. This maybe because the landmass size is not the real landmass size we are being told it is.

An image I took onboard a navy vessel during a Cat 5 storm between Terria del Fuego and the Antarctica ice shelf — SLR F2AS roll film.

Anyone sailing on their own accord past 60° south are abruptly stopped by naval patrol and told to turn around. Privately owned planes flying past 60° south will be shot down. Getting permits, is only through the compulsory diplomatic channels, costing mega-thousands, and normally refused wasting time, money, and energy. Whatever was discovered, and still being secretly hidden, since 1959, has nothing to do with penguin colonies. Penguins have been used as deceptive smoke clouds covering up what's beyond the ice shelf wall. One thing for sure, it's so BIG, the powers that be, are afraid of global population knowing the truth. Ironically, the UN logo uses the same map design as the 1892 Gleasons map. No, just a simple coincidence — or is it? We do live in a cartoonish world of make believe reality controlled by strings of gatekeepers. Nothing is what it actually is, not even maps.
All maps through time have either been hidden, altered, modified or changed. Through the Age of Aires, cancer and Capricorn were positioned in the northern and southern tropical latitudes. That Age passed 2000 plus years ago, and has never been updated. We have been in the Age of Pisces, which placed Gemini and Sagittarius in the northern and southern tropical latitudes for 2000 years. Now we are at the start of another new Age, Aquarius. This replaces Taurus and Scorpio in the tropical latitudes. Do you really think map makers through time, ten plus centuries ago, just ignored updating their maps? Where are all the original maps from the Pisces timeline?

Did you know NASA first creates flat maps then wraps them around a ball? Proving the Earth is a globe without using sources from NASA, military or government data doesn't exist — What does that tell you? How do you deprogram yourself from decades of deception? "Then we wrapped the flat map around a ball", is good start. All original GPS source coding is never revealed — why is that? The 1892 Gleason's map shows north is center, with the ice shelf positioned in all directions south of north. Antarctica has been off limits since 1959. What did they discover, or more importantly, what are they hiding? Did you know long haul commercial flights within the southern hemisphere deactivate GPS after take-off, and aren't switched back on until landing? Northern commercial flights do not deactivate GPS. Maybe the penguin colonies complained about signal noise. Since all the rocket launches from the 1960s, we still haven't seen one full original image of Earth captured from space. Why is that? With all the advanced technology, we are unable to freely access live images of the Antarctica shelf — Why not? All people get, are modified live views of Antarctica's edge. Instead, we get thousands of CGI perfect fakery composite images of other planets, including fake image renditions of earth. The entire space program since the early 1960s, is about directing global populations to look at space — Not Antarctica! Look at the Moon, look at Mars, look at anything, but don't ask questions about Antarctica.  
Extraterrestrial — extra-Terra, terrarium, coming from or existing land mass., extra-terrestrial — outside, beyond the scope of, terrestrial — of or pertaining to the earth, earthly, of the earth, on land.

No one has freely traveled beyond the southern 60th parallel, since 1959. It's not for the penguins or ice.

What's really causing climate change? What has been hidden from global population since 1959? I've always questioned why no one can freely travel beyond the southern 60° parallel. Why are there so many top level dignitaries constantly visiting this region? To look at penguins? What could be happening, is the changing position and direction of N. moving around true north, causing one side of the landmass — beyond 60° becoming unfrozen, while the other side begins freezing up. At the same time, new landmass begins emerging realms of the old world landmass i.e. extra tierra. The below simulation relates to a non-rotating flat earth. NASA has been using the same simulation procedure, since the early 1960s with their rockets, jets and missile trajectories i.e. 'relative to a flat non-rotating earth.' Airline pilots also train using the same procedure in flight school.
So are gatekeepers of this world, including specific globalists already moving secretly in and out of this new evolving landmass? Probably possible, but no one has been able to get evidence of this, because of the long established triple security perimeters @60° south. Let's not forget, south is not what we think it is. South is in all directions from center North. Maybe that's why the secret cabal of this world require extending time until enough new territory becomes livable. In other words, they will continue the fake space program, as cover, initiate new fear wars, create massive chaos and mayhem, at full throttle, before moving across to new lands permanently. The rest of global population will become exterminated, starve, and kill each other off. This of course are only assumptions regulated by the website owner  — do your own research.

Below, an article in the Hawaiian Gazette, January 1907 — Read it for yourself beyond the headline

Just in case you missed it "It has been hidden from Japanese government in modern times just as it was in ancient times, for in olden days such a map would have been destroyed by the authorities." And this was written in 1907! So what do you think the controllers of this world have been doing for the last century? Twiddling their toes watching sport & Netflix? Open your eyes, get off fluoride ASP. 

Do you trust Google Search? If so, you're a fool requiring to wake up what's being fed to you. Anyone using Google/android smartphones are compromised. Best advice — throw your Google operated junk down the toilet, and don't look back. 
Quick example Google 2016 'Can anyone circumnavigate over the Antarctica ice shelf'?
Google 111) 'Since the North Pole and Antarctica are covered in ice and guarded "NO-FLY" zones, no ships or planes have ever been known to circumnavigate the Earth in North/South directions'.
Google 2024 'Planes can and do sometimes fly over Antarctica. It is NOT Illegal, it is just very impractical to do so. So why the sudden change by Google in eight years? Go figure. It's because most people can't remember what they researched within short time periods.

Finders Keepers - Not Lunar Rock Fakes.

Remember when NASA got caught out red handed with fake Moon rock? Do you really think NASA with all their excuses, they had made a mistake donating Earth rock instead of Lunar rock? It doesn't matter whether NASA pre-collects their specimen rocks from Antarctica or Greenland — One lie is enough! What is real, is this cephalopod found at high elevation (4400m). It's not gold or an uncut diamond, but it was well worth the effort and time reaching this inhospitable isolated region.     

Below, nothing makes sense until you personally start questioning transparent deceptions right in front of your face. There are no issues culling, burning, and clearing Earth's largest rain fores — the Amazon. But, since 1959, no one can freely travel, or explore beyond the 60th south parallel. The programmed deception that penguins and ice must remain pristine doesn't at all add up. The greatest exposure of all, the signing of the 1959 Antarctica treaty, by numerous nations, who've continuously waged conflicts of war between themselves, at one another, since that treaty was signed-off. What does that tell you? All wars are controlled wars by Global elite gatekeepers. Call them banker wars, call them what you wish, Everything is staged, nothing is what it is.

Chem spraying skies, controlling water supplies and food stocks, culling forests, and telling what you should and should not eat, is where we're at. Anything and everything including fake space deviating from Antarctica. What are they hiding they don't want us to know? What do they know they want so desperately keeping to themselves? Antarctica isn't what we have been led to believe. Until people can freely navigate beyond the 60th south parallel, on their own accord, in their own time. Nothing can be trusted!

It's only taken six plus decades of constant deceptive outer space programming to brainwash populations. First through valve radio, then TV and cinema of weekly series and movie screenings. A few worth mentioning, the Twilight Zone, Doctor Who, Star Trek, Lost In Space, Time Tunnel, Space Odyssey, Planet of the Apes, Close Encounters, ET, Battlestar Galactica, Dune, Aliens, V, The Terminator I, II, III, Total Recall, Independence Day, X Files, The Matrix, Contact, Moon, Star Wars, Gravity, The Martian, Arrival, Blade Runner I & II  etc. At the same time, the heliocentric model has been pushed to maximum levels via NASA, NASA affiliates, government, educational and scientific institutes, Geo science mags and documentaries, Google search, Google Maps, Google Earth, and last, but not least — global main stream media.
Everything mentioned above has been accomplished, in lock step, Nothing was by chance or coincidence creating what we have today — A make believe fake reality of space above Earth's landmass.

Only those fast asleep still believe an eight day round trip of 480.000 miles happened — That's what 55+ years of programming does to you. 

What has remained almost transparent from the above, since the late 1950s? What has been kept under tight wraps that has never reached the intensity levels of fake space programming? What is the white elephant in the room? Antarctica! That rabbit hole is deep as it is silent. The reasons for this is obvious. Antarctica's physical location and landmass size, is not what we have been told. Google Earth shows this, by not revealing Antarctica's total landmass. Google Maps give incorrect continental physical landmass sizes when comparing mileage distances. We have been programmed and conditioned with numerous mind control agendas to instead, look up at fake space. The perfect decoy of keeping that white elephant invisible. A 60+ year old deceptive narrative at the highest level, since 1959. The auto-programming of populations has been more than effective, so effective, almost no one will believe what has been written here.    

Classic SLR roll film still, late 1980s, south America. We are told the Earth's spin, is 1000 MPH and constant speed @66,000 MPH orbiting around the sun, rotating in three different directions. What's questionable when following the heliocentric model, is the lack of dispersion of volcanic plume when reaching high altitude, like above, which remains stationary, in a fixed position without moving, at times for days on end. It shows an opposite viewpoint of Earth's landmass appearing level and still, with little to no movement. Image Height 2800 m, distance to Navidad, 122 km.          

Ocean fluid remains level and stationary without losing a drop. Lakes are smooth as glass. Invisible gravity has the power holding everything intact. We are constantly @66 mach speed, non-stop rotating around the sun. This is what we've been told to believe — Really? It's taken decades upon decades of deceptive programing on populations initiating the spell — it worked. Anyone questioning the spell are automatically shamed, ridiculed as conspiracy freaks on LSD. The heliocentric theory must be kept bound together at all costs. If the spell collapses, the entire global model system falls apart breaking the spell quicker than stacked dominoes.       

NASA, NASA affiliates, and their lab coat scientists have given the world a continuous false fake reality. What's frightening, we all believed it, until now. They've been caught out red handed not once, but multiple times through the decades producing CGI deep space fakes with video and still composites. Bubbles floating in space, even space itself questions the globe model. All that invisible gravity still remaining invisible. Yet people still believe in the lie. That's what ultra-mind programming does to you when constantly fed the same narratives day in day out, since childhood. Filling young minds with pseudoscience gives long term impacts of rejecting anything against what has been told without bothering to question it. It's called lazy brain syndrome.

Breaking away from everything you've been educated with, programmed with, is by doing your own time and motion studies. Once you begin, you'll soon realize everything you were told was nothing more than pure deception. Until that's accomplished, your mind and thought process is limited trapped inside a prison planet. Many will still continue following the science, because of decades of non-stop brainwashing. The latest example, 2020. How many believed taking vaccine jab juice was safe and effective? How many millions from all walks of life who are now suffering from taking that poison? How many have died suddenly, since early 2021, or now have various symptoms that have become life threatening? Are you one of them, or know others in that predicament? It's because people believed in what they're were being told blindly without questioning it. Doing your own research, using self-critical thinking skills, questioning everything, is more than paramount living within today's realm of make believe reality.     

NASA - Voodoo Magic

Nothing Really Is What It Appears To Be.

Deceptive programming is the act of producing untrue information and data knowing to be false convincing populations it's true.

If you have believed anything NASA has shown you, anything mainstream media has told you, or anything viewed on history channels — you've been mind-controlled to the point that anything you've seen and heard, is believed, without even questioning it. Nothing is what it really is. The only way out, is by deprogramming yourself from decades of deceptive mind-control. It began on your first day of school staring at a spinning ball on the teachers desk. At this age, no one dared question the globe model or maps. We believed what we were shown without recognizing the deceptive programming indoctrination. Image, 600 meter long shot across mudflats gas axe cutting through the hull of a decommissioned cargo ship — 6MP FX DSLR & manual focus AIS prime.

Lunar Moon Addict - No!

I know what you're thinking, am I a full on Moon addict? No, only when clear skies at locations allow the opportunity to photograph. 

Getting through continents overland at your own pace hasn't changed. Crossing land borders self-driving, using bush buses, bush trains, grabbing truck lifts, hitching rides in the middle of nowhere, including cargo passage vessels from one location to another are normal day to day, week to week, month to month occurrences. In all the above, the common tendency, is to capture, on the go transit snaps, location shots, people shots, landscape, bird and wildlife and other diverse subject matter.
At the same time, strolling around in bustling urban sprawl, knowing what's happening around you, who's watching you, if handed spiked drinks or food, or staying in rooms without knowledge of hidden spy cameras are travel obstacles that even catch out the wary. Completing overland journeys through continents without being robbed, mugged, drugged, raped or bribed, and leaving with all the baggage you traveled with requires self-critical thinking skills i.e. awareness, instinct, rapid response and communication skills.   

When setup with older photo gear in open public spaces I'm bombarded with the same old same old questions 'why are you using such an antique lens?', 'are you crazy traveling with heavy camera gear?', 'my little point & shoot is good enough', 'how can you get sharp focus using that old junk', 'what, you're still using a D3?', 'etc. This is how it is in the 2020s. What most don't realize, or fathom, a tiny little 6MP image taken with any quality lens can produce stunning images. The addiction to mass amounts of megapixels has past the point of no-return. So which photo-gear should I be using in the mid-2020s? Simply what I'm already using that has never let me down. In other words, digital DSLR  full frame bodies will be capturing the majority of my street still captures until the need of replacement.

Nothing's better than using reliable equipment that keeps on doing what it was designed to do — work. Investing in cheap made junk only has limited time before failure, or falling to bits, usually within months. Periodic self-maintenance helps keep stuff operating continuously. Even quality made camera gear requires servicing during overland journeys related to dust, grit, grime and temperature changes. The above 3 items have consecutively been used and covered countless overland mileage for more than eight years — with no issues. That's why I'm still using them. Just to prove a point, the BV Minox BRW 10x25, German made binoculars (fully waterproof) were purchased in 2008 secondhand, and then used throughout all of South America, up and down all of Africa, the Mid-East, and most of south east Asia — traveling overland. It's now 2024, the Minox 10x25, still working perfectly with zero issues — how about that?      

Another useful gem, a 2010 waterproof headlamp that's done some serious work through the continents — still working perfectly in 2024.  

The same question arises of what makes good still captures. Most will say, it's because of the latest camera and lens being used. Others point at composition, angle and location of where it was captured. Adding in the megapixel debate, no one really agrees on what makes a reasonable good still. What is known, it doesn't require expensive camera bodies capturing quality stills, even in the lowest megapixel range of 5MP (excludes smartphone junk). I can verify this just by these examples taken with 2007 & 09 12MP DSLR bodies in DX format.

A steppe eagle feeding off a carcass. We are told humans eating meat is now unhealthy and to start consuming bugs and insects instead. Just imagine the outcome, if winged carnivores were forced to shut down their daily staple food source of fish and meat. They would become weakened, and rapidly wiped out — all of them. The addition of mRNA into all livestock, and the need of mass culling of chickens and animals, all blamed on bird flu sounds more like a nefarious agenda program, by elites and globalist cabal to depopulate the human race, by all means necessary — more on that in the global live page.      

Overland travel street still photography. The total opposite of make believe reality and fake space pseudoscience. Best advice — watch less TV, and smartphone swiping. Reducing brain fog, is by disconnecting from globalist controlled mainstream media and social media. Reeducating yourself, is by stepping out beyond your boundary circles, enjoying what is real right in front of your face. The opposite of Google, Netflix, Social media and smartphone addiction.

It's not about megapixels, it's about lens quality — 1986 Nikkor 800 5.6 ED AIS prime — 85% crop enlarged 5MP image stills.

Also worth a mention, using the latest camera gear following trends doesn't make you a better street still photographer. What's more worthy, is that one shot that counts. Approval ratings from others should be ignored. Personal preferences in the photographic world are always in conflict. It's about getting the best results of any subject matter from camera gear used on any particular day. Still photography is best described, as fluid. One day may capture better results than previous days at the same location. The total implosion of videography, is nothing more than an online fashion trend. Great looking still images in canvas mounted on walls keep their ambience for years.

I've probably completed more overland travel mileage through continents than most people, spanning over 4+ decades. What I've come to realize, is that no matter what location I'm at, there is simply no Earth curvature. Arriving at any coastline reveals the same results when observing from shorelines — dead straight level ocean horizons. Even from distant mountainous viewpoints, ocean sea levels show no signs of horizontal curvature. The same results onboard cargo vessels crossing oceans, including up @35k feet above open oceans and coastal continental landmass — curvature does not exist. Doing you own individual time and motion studies is good start.